Loya v. Texas Dept. of Corrections, 88-6145

Decision Date02 August 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-6145,88-6145
Citation878 F.2d 860
PartiesRuben LOYA, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellant. Summary Calendar.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

James C. Todd, Kathlyn C. Wilson, Asst Attys. Gen., Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Leopoldo Fraga, Jr., Fraga & Associates, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, JOHNSON and JOLLY, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:

The Texas Department of Corrections appeals from an order of the district court denying its motion to dismiss this action on the ground of eleventh amendment sovereign immunity. Finding that the district court erred in denying the motion, we remand with instructions that the suit against the Texas Department of Corrections be dismissed.

Ruben Loya, Jr. brought suit against the Texas Department of Corrections (TDC) as the only defendant. His complaint asserted claims for racial and national origin discrimination under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 and 1983, as well as a pendent state law claim for the infliction of emotional distress. He sought monetary relief totalling over $500,000 and any other equitable relief the court might consider just and proper. The TDC moved to dismiss the suit based on its sovereign immunity under the eleventh amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court denied the motion, and the TDC filed an interlocutory appeal.

We turn first to the issue of whether this court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Appeals from the denial of qualified or absolute immunity are a well recognized exception to the general rule that interlocutory appeals are not reviewable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 525-28, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2814-16, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985) (interlocutory appeal from the denial of a government official's absolute immunity); Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 743, 102 S.Ct. 2690, 2697, 73 L.Ed.2d 349 (1982) (interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity). Although neither the Supreme Court nor this circuit has had occasion to apply this exception to denials of a state's absolute immunity under the eleventh amendment, there is no basis for distinguishing cases in which a state's sovereign immunity is questioned. ENG v. Coughlin, 858 F.2d 889, 893-95 (2nd Cir.1988). See also, Mitchell, 472 U.S. at 526-28, 105 S.Ct. at 2815-16. Therefore, we hold that a denial of motion to dismiss claims on the grounds of eleventh amendment immunity is a final decision appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. Accord ENG, 858 F.2d at 894.

On the merits we hold that TDC's entitlement to immunity under...

To continue reading

Request your trial
42 cases
  • Stewart v. Baldwin County Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • August 15, 1990
    ...v. Lensink, 798 F.2d 607, 608 (2d Cir.1986) (same); Coakley v. Welch, 877 F.2d 304, 305 (4th Cir.1989) (same); Loya v. Texas Dept. of Corrections, 878 F.2d 860, 861 (5th Cir.1989) (same), with Libby v. Marshall, 833 F.2d 402, 405-07 (1st Cir.1987) (holding that denial of Eleventh Amendment ......
  • Barry v. Fordice, Civ. A. No. J92-0559(W)(C).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Mississippi
    • December 3, 1992
    ...the "merits" of the suit, and any order regarding such an Eleventh Amendment issue is immediately appealable. Loya v. Texas Department of Corrections, 878 F.2d 860 (5th Cir.1989).7 Under the Eleventh Amendment, suits against non-consenting states by their own citizens, by citizens of anothe......
  • Simpson v. Salsbery
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • September 30, 2021
    ...from any claim for monetary damages against them in their official capacity as TDCJ employees. See Loya v. Texas Dep't of Corrections, 878 F.2d 860, 861 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam) ("[TDCJ]’s entitlement to immunity under the [E]leventh [A]mendment is clearly established in this circuit.")......
  • Harris v. Angelina County, Tex.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • September 13, 1994
    ...was "merely an agency of the state"), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1042, 103 S.Ct. 1438, 75 L.Ed.2d 795 (1983); Loya v. Texas Dep't of Corrections, 878 F.2d 860, 861 (5th Cir.1989) (holding TDC immune from suit under Eleventh Amendment). In contrast, counties generally are not immune from suit un......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT