Loyd v. State, 47687
| Decision Date | 13 March 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 47687,47687 |
| Parties | Earnest E. LOYD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Ronald A. Piperi, Killeen, for appellant.
Joe Carroll, Dist. Atty., Arthur C. Eads, Asst. Dist. Atty., Belton, Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., and Buddy Stevens, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
The conviction is for the offense of possession of heroin; punishment was assessed at 12 years' confinement. Two grounds of error are raised on appeal; the sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
Appellant's initial contention concerns the failure of the trial court to permit a defense witness to testify concerning his reputation for being a peaceful and law-abiding citizen. Both at the guilt-innocence stage of the trial and at the punishment hearing, the appellant offered the testimony of his commanding officer for this purpose. Each time, the court sustained the State's objection, on the grounds that the witness was not qualified to express such an opinion. This issue of qualification is now before this Court.
The State stresses the fact that this officer's relationship with the appellant was strictly a business one, and that he could not testify to the appellant's reputation in the community in which he lived since the appellant lived off base, in Killeen, and the officer lived on base at Fort Hood. We reject such a notion. The record reflects that this officer had spoken with people concerning the appellant's reputation, and these were people who both worked and socialized with the appellant. The witness further stated that as a result of this, and 'having talked to the people in the community where he resides and knows best,' he was able to form an opinion as to what appellant's reputation was in the community, as far as being a peaceable and law-abiding citizen. He testified that appellant had a good reputation on this point. The officer stated that for fifteen months he had known the appellant and lived and worked in the same general community as appellant.
The trial court should not have sustained the State's objection; the testimony elicited that this officer and the appellant did not socialize together after hours is meaningless. Likewise, questioning the officer as to whether or not he had ever visited in the home of the appellant has nothing to do with the witness's qualifications to testify on this issue.
The case of Frison v. State, 473 S.W.2d 479 (Tex.Cr.App.1971) contains a lengthy discussion of the case law in this area. There it was pointed out that it is not even necessary that the witness be Personally acquainted with the accused in order to be qualified to testify concerning his reputation for being a peaceful and law-abiding citizen. That cause involved an officerwitness and it was pointed out under what circumstances such a witness' reputation testimony would be admissible. See also, Nichols v. State, 494 S.W.2d 830 (Tex.Cr.App.1973) and Pogue v. State, 474 S.W.2d 492 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). 1
The case of Jordan v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 287, 290 S.W.2d 666 (1956) held it to be error where the trial court refused to permit testimony relating to the accused's reputation for being a peaceable, law-abiding citizen and for truth and veracity under the following circumstances: the offered testimony was from witnesses from Dallas where the accused worked, even though they...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
O'Bryan v. State
...knowledge of Jackson's reputation for truth and veracity at his place of employment, was qualified to testify to such. Loyd v. State, 506 S.W.2d 600 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); see also Jordan v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 287, 290 S.W.2d 666 (1956); Hayles v. State, 507 S.W.2d 213 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). Thes......
-
Zuniga v. State, 13-81-157-CR
...of what Barrera's testimony would have been on the matter of the civil claim were sufficient to preserve the error. Loyd v. State, 506 S.W.2d 600, 601 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). Cf. Passmore v. State, 617 S.W.2d 682 The record supports the State's argument with regard to the evidence of other compl......
-
Ables v. State, 49545
...the witness to have discussed appellant's reputation with persons who lived in the same community where appellant lived. In Loyd v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 506 S.W.2d 600, it was held that an officer who lived on the military base was not disqualified to testify as to defendant's reputation for......
-
Hayles v. State
...and out of law enforcement.' The witness was sufficiently qualified and we overrule this contention. The case of Loyd v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 506 S.W.2d 600 (Delivered March 13, 1974) contains a thorough discussion of qualifying a witness as to his ability to state his opinion relative to an......