Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Felix
| Decision Date | 27 June 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 04-994.,04-994. |
| Parties | LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. <I>v.</I> FELIX ET AL. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Certiorari denied. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
11 cases
-
Roybal v. Los Alamos Nat'L. Bank
... ... Insurance Company, Dennis Rivera, and Valley Abstract and Title Co., Inc., Defendants ... No. CIV 05-0331 JB/LFG ... United States District ... statute, is not enough to authorize removal to federal court." Felix v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., 387 F.3d 1146, 1154 (10th Cir.2004), cert ... ...
-
Colbert v. Union Pacific R. Co.
...998, 1002-03 (W.D.Mo. 2006); 36. See Felix v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 387 F.3d 1146, 1156 (10th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1149, 125 S.Ct. 2961, 162 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005); Meyer v. Conlon, 162 F.3d 1264, 1268 n. 2 (10th Cir.1998); Carland v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 935 F.2d 1114, 1118-......
-
Fayard v. Northeast Vehicle Services, LLC
...and so simply disappears. E.g., Felix v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 387 F.3d 1146, 1162 (10th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1149, 125 S.Ct. 2961, 162 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005). This brings us to the application of the complete preemption doctrine in this case. Although the lower courts are divided o......
-
Potts v. CitiFinancial, Inc.
...removal jurisdiction, see Felix v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., 387 F.3d 1146, 1157 (10th Cir.2004), cert. denied,545 U.S. 1149, 125 S.Ct. 2961, 162 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005). Complete preemption sufficient to create federal removal jurisdiction applies only to that more limited class of claims that......
Request a trial to view additional results