Lund v. Alanis

Decision Date11 November 1964
Docket NumberNo. A-10411,A-10411
Citation384 S.W.2d 123
PartiesGeorge LUND, Petitioner, v. Avero Alanis ALANIS et al., Respondents.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Barnes & Elick, McAllen, for petitioner.

Luther E. Jones, Jr., Corpus Christi, Frank R. Nye, Jr., County Atty., Rio Grande City, Emilio F. Gutierrez, Rio Grande City, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed this cause, and its action was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 381 S.W.2d 955. The cause is now moot and hence the order of dismissal should stand. We dismiss the application for writ of error without reference to the merits. Guajardo v. Alamo Lumber Co., 159 Tex. 225, 317 S.W.2d 725.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. City of Kountze
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 14. Oktober 1976
    ...Alamo Lumber Company, 159 Tex. 225, 317 S.W.2d 725 (1958); Blanton v. City of Houston, 163 Tex. 224, 353 S.W.2d 412 (1962); Lund v. Alanis, 384 S.W.2d 123 (Tex.1964); LeFebvre v. LeFebvre, 510 S.W.2d 29, 31 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1974, no writ), concurring It is readily apparent, from the ......
  • Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Preston
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 13. Juni 1974
    ...v. Alamo Lumber Co., 159 Tex. 225, 317 S.W.2d 725 (1958); Blanton v. City of Houston, 163 Tex. 224, 353 S.W.2d 412 (1962); Lund v. Alanis, 384 S.W.2d 123 (Tex.1964). Obviously, our compliance with this generally prevailing rule would deny to Exxon even the limited relief to which it is enti......
  • In re Bailey Pontiac, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas
    • 21. April 1992
    ... ... & Rem.Code §§ 37.001.011 (Vernon 1986 and Supp.1992), is remedial in nature and procedural in character. Lund v. Alanis, 381 S.W.2d 955, 956 (Tex. Civ.App. — San Antonio), writ dism'd, 384 S.W.2d 123 (Tex.1964). Because the adversary proceeding is an action ... ...
  • Jones v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 26. Mai 1977
    ...Dismissal of the appeal alone would leave the trial court's judgment outstanding and would amount to an affirmance. Lund v. Alanis, 384 S.W.2d 123 (Tex.1964); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863 (1943). Here the corporation's suit was dismissed for failure to pay franchise taxe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT