Lund v. Alanis
Decision Date | 11 November 1964 |
Docket Number | No. A-10411,A-10411 |
Citation | 384 S.W.2d 123 |
Parties | George LUND, Petitioner, v. Avero Alanis ALANIS et al., Respondents. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Barnes & Elick, McAllen, for petitioner.
Luther E. Jones, Jr., Corpus Christi, Frank R. Nye, Jr., County Atty., Rio Grande City, Emilio F. Gutierrez, Rio Grande City, for respondents.
The trial court dismissed this cause, and its action was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 381 S.W.2d 955. The cause is now moot and hence the order of dismissal should stand. We dismiss the application for writ of error without reference to the merits. Guajardo v. Alamo Lumber Co., 159 Tex. 225, 317 S.W.2d 725.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. City of Kountze
...Alamo Lumber Company, 159 Tex. 225, 317 S.W.2d 725 (1958); Blanton v. City of Houston, 163 Tex. 224, 353 S.W.2d 412 (1962); Lund v. Alanis, 384 S.W.2d 123 (Tex.1964); LeFebvre v. LeFebvre, 510 S.W.2d 29, 31 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1974, no writ), concurring It is readily apparent, from the ......
-
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Preston
...v. Alamo Lumber Co., 159 Tex. 225, 317 S.W.2d 725 (1958); Blanton v. City of Houston, 163 Tex. 224, 353 S.W.2d 412 (1962); Lund v. Alanis, 384 S.W.2d 123 (Tex.1964). Obviously, our compliance with this generally prevailing rule would deny to Exxon even the limited relief to which it is enti......
-
In re Bailey Pontiac, Inc.
... ... & Rem.Code §§ 37.001.011 (Vernon 1986 and Supp.1992), is remedial in nature and procedural in character. Lund v. Alanis, 381 S.W.2d 955, 956 (Tex. Civ.App. — San Antonio), writ dism'd, 384 S.W.2d 123 (Tex.1964). Because the adversary proceeding is an action ... ...
-
Jones v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
...Dismissal of the appeal alone would leave the trial court's judgment outstanding and would amount to an affirmance. Lund v. Alanis, 384 S.W.2d 123 (Tex.1964); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863 (1943). Here the corporation's suit was dismissed for failure to pay franchise taxe......