Lundak v. Chicago & N.W.R. Co.
Decision Date | 13 December 1884 |
Parties | LUNDAK v. THE CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY CO |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Benton Circuit Court.
REVERSED.
Hubbard, Clark & Dawley, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
THE facts are stated in the opinion.
The plaintiff commenced this action before a justice of the peace, and claimed to recover $ 40. There was a trial, and a judgment was rendered by the justice in favor of the plaintiff for $ 24. The defendant appealed to the circuit court, and, on motion of the plaintiff, the appeal was dismissed on the ground that the amount in controversy was less than $ 100; and the trial judge has, in substance, asked us to determine whether the appeal was correctly dismissed. The statute provides that McClain's Code, § 3575. When the action was commenced and tried by the justice, the amount in controversy was $ 40. If the plaintiff had appealed, as he might have done, the amount in controversy would have been the same. If the plaintiff could appeal, it would seem that the defendant should have such right, for it is reciprocal. An appeal from the judgment of a justice, by either party, "brings up a cause for the trial on the merits." Code, § 3590. On the trial of this appeal in the circuit court, the plaintiff, under the pleadings, could have recovered a judgment for $ 40. By appealing, the defendant recognized the right of the plaintiff to such a judgment, and we therefore think the amount in controversy exceeded $ 25, and that the court erred in dismissing the appeal.
REVERSED.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kingsbury v. Franz
... ... This conclusion has support in the ajudications of the courts ... of other states. (Vide Lundak v. Chicago & N. W. R ... Co., 65 Iowa 473, 21 N.W. 783; Sterner v ... Wilson, 68 Iowa 714, 28 ... ...
-
Henry v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
... ... Ordinarily the amount in controversy is determined by ... the pleadings, or by the respective oral claims of the ... parties to the suit. Lundak v. C. [127 Iowa 579] ... & N.W. Ry. Co., 65 Iowa 473, 21 N.W. 783; ... Sterner v. Wilson, 68 Iowa 714, 28 N.W. 34. But this ... is not always the ... ...
-
Morrow v. Bell
...using the plural and thereby referring to the petition and answer. They cite Nichols v. Wood, 66 Iowa, 225, 23 N. W. 641;Lundak v. Railway, 65 Iowa, 473, 21 N. W. 783;Perry v. Conger, 65 Iowa, 588, 22 N. W. 688. They argue that the amount in controversy, therefore, as shown by these pleadin......
-
Henry v. Chi., R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
...amount in controversy is determined by the pleadings, or by the respective oral claims of the parties to the suit. Lundak v. C. & N. W. Ry. Co., 65 Iowa, 473, 21 N. W. 783;Sterner v. Wilson, 68 Iowa, 714, 28 N. W. 34. But this is not always the test. Thus, in Young v. McWaid, 57 Iowa, 101, ......