Lyman v. Northern Pac. Elevator Co.
Decision Date | 29 August 1894 |
Citation | 62 F. 891 |
Parties | LYMAN v. NORTHERN PAC. ELEVATOR CO. (CULLIFORD, Intervenor). |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota |
John B Sanborn, for intervenor.
Davis Kellogg & Severance, for defendant Northern Pac. Elevator Co. and for M. J. Forbes, Receiver.
This cause has been heard upon a motion by the intervenor for judgment upon the petition of intervention and answer. The following facts appear:
On or about August 15, 1890, the Northern Pacific Elevator Company was a corporation created under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Minnesota, owning a line of elevators through the states of Minnesota, North Dakota, Idaho, Washington, and Oregon; and being in need of money to carry on its business and owing a large amount of money, the stockholders of the company made and entered into an agreement with each other whereby they subscribed for a loan to said company for $275,235, pro rata, according to the number of shares held by each, and signed an agreement, agreeing to take the company's note at 12 months, bearing 7 per cent. interest per annum. The agreement was in the following words and figures.
'Minneapolis August 15th, 1890.
The said agreement was signed by all the stockholders making said loan, exceeding 10,000 shares. One of the stockholders so signing said agreement was L. Fletcher, and he received the company's note therefor, which was renewed, and which said original note and renewal note read as follows: '1,996.74 Minneapolis, Minn., Sept. 1st, 1892.
'One year after date, we promise to pay to the order of L. Fletcher nineteen hundred and ninety-six 74/100 dollars at our office in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in accordance with the terms of his subscription to the loan of Aug. 15, 1890, with interest at the rate of 7%, payable semiannually.
The intervenor is the immediate indorsee of Fletcher.
It further appears that the company is insolvent, that there have been no net earnings, and that the debts exceed the property by several hundred thousand dollars. On this state of facts, I think the intervenor cannot recover.
At the date of the agreement of August 15, 1890, and of the note of which the one under present consideration is a renewal, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Seattle Auto. Co. v. Stimson
... ... 185, 23 P. 286. See, also, 9 Cyc. pp. 615, 616, 700; ... Lyman v. Northern Pacific Elevator Co. (C. C.) 62 F ... 891; Congdon v ... ...
-
Gardiner v. Equitable Office Bldg. Corporation
...manner than that specified in the written instrument. Richardson v. Hardwick, 106 U.S. 252, 1 Sup.Ct. 213, 27 L.Ed. 145; Lyman v. N. P. Elevator Co. (C.C.) 62 F. 891. payment is made out of an agreed fund, until such fund has been created, there can be no liability. It is a condition preced......
-
Zorn v. Sweet
... ... v. Carpenter, 43 Tex. Civ. App ... 229, 95 S.W. 57; Lyman v. Northern Pac. Elevator ... Co. (C. C.) 62 F. 891; Young v. Smith, ... ...
-
Tibbals v. Keys
... ... Smith ... v. Ross, et al., (Mich.) 16 N.W. 258; Lyman v ... Co., 62 F. 891; Peasles v. Co., (Ore.) 135 P ... 521; Frank ... ...