Lynch v. Dimaya, 15–1498.

Decision Date29 September 2016
Docket NumberNo. 15–1498.,15–1498.
CitationLynch v. Dimaya, 137 S. Ct. 31, 195 L.Ed.2d 902(Mem) (2016)
Parties Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, petitioner, v. James Garcia DIMAYA.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
39 cases
  • Runyon v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • January 19, 2017
    ..., 808 F.3d 719, 723 (7th Cir. 2015) ; Dimaya v. Lynch , 803 F.3d 1110, 1120 (9th Cir. 2015), cert. granted , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 31, 195 L.Ed.2d 902 (2016). The Fourth Circuit has not decided whether the language in the Section 924(c)(3) residual clause is void for vagueness after John......
  • Baptiste v. Attorney Gen. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • November 8, 2016
    ...808 F.3d 719 (7th Cir. 2015) ; Dimaya v. Lynch , 803 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir. 2015), cert. granted , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 31, 195 L.Ed.2d 902, No. 15–1498, 2016 WL 3232911 (U.S. Sept. 29, 2016) ; Golicov v. Lynch , 837 F.3d 1065, No. 16–9530, 2016 WL 4988012 (10th Cir. Sept. 19, 2016). By co......
  • United States v. Eshetu
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • July 25, 2017
    ...to Section 16(b) in the wake of Johnson . See Dimaya v. Lynch , 803 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir. 2015), cert. granted , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 31, 195 L.Ed.2d 902 (2016). For now, though, Leocal 's recognition—that courts may more manageably evaluate the risk of force being used in the commission ......
  • United States v. Diaz, 16-4226
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 26, 2017
    ...States v. Vivas–Ceja, 808 F.3d 719 (7th Cir. 2015) ; Dimaya v. Lynch, 803 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir. 2015), cert. granted, ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 31, 195 L.Ed.2d 902 (2016). But see United States v. Gonzalez–Longoria, 831 F.3d 670, 674–79 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (finding 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) cons......
  • Get Started for Free