Lynes v. Schmolt
| Decision Date | 12 December 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 47710,47710 |
| Parties | LYNES et al. v. SCHMOLT. |
| Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Zastrow & Noah, of Charles City and R. J. Sullivan, of New Hampton, for appellants.
Reed & Beers, of Waterloo, and E. P. Donohue, of New Hampton, for appellee.
This is a companion case to Koob v. Schmolt, Iowa, 45 N.W.2d 216. Plaintiff owned and operated the motorcycle upon which Koob was riding. Plaintiff was injured and his motorcycle was demolished when it collided with defendant's automobile. However, there is some variance in the records of the two cases.
The accident happened on a clear day in May, 1949, in the country, on Highway 218, a paved highway with a concrete slab eighteen feet wide. The highway runs from Nashua in a southerly direction for about one and one half miles where it makes a 'fairly quick' curve to the right (west). Plaintiff was an experienced motorcycle operator and was familiar with this curve.
He testified he drove his motorcycle toward it from the north at a speed of seventy, seventy five or eighty miles per hour. When he was three hundred feet or more from the curve he saw defendant's automobile approaching from the opposite direction at a distance of about one eighth of a mile and a speed of thirty or thirty five miles per hour. Plaintiff started to reduce the speed of the motorcycle but did not 'brake down as much as I could because I didn't dare to skid the cycle.' He first applied his brakes to the limit when he was about seventy five feet north of the curve. At about that point he saw he was traveling too fast to 'make the curve' on the inside, so he 'sliced' across from the west (right) lane of the pavement to the east dirt shoulder and traveled upon it around the outside ('big side') of the curve about two hundred and forty feet to the point of collision. He testified: to avoid a collision. 'My speed had placed me where I found I had to go to the other side of the road, * * *.' The motorcycle was traveling at about sixty miles per hour when it arrived at the curve. Plaintiff didn't have the motorcycle under such control he could 'make the turn' but was able to guide it along the shoulder four or five feet east of the pavement 'braking down as I went.'
Meanwhile defendant's automobile, traveling in the east lane of the pavement, 'began to slow down' and to 'creep out' to the right (east) edge of the pavement. It continued to travel on the pavement until the two vehicles were approximately twenty five feet apart, when defendant 'suddenly pulled over onto the shoulder and run into my path, and of course we collided.' The motorcycle was then four or five feet east of the pavement on the shoulder. Defendant cut sharply across and didn't travel far on the shoulder before the collision. The car was then traveling five or ten miles per hour, and plaintiff had reduced the speed of the motorcycle to from thirty two to thirty five miles per hour.
At the conclusion of the evidence for plaintiff the court sustained defendant's motion for a directed verdict in her favor on the ground the evidence showed plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. We hold this order was correct.
Section 321.285, Code of Iowa 1950, I.C.A., provides: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mueller v. Roben
...we think that it was a question of fact as to which of the parties had the right of way'. Appellant cites and quotes from Lynes v. Schmolt, 241 Iowa 1303, 45 N.W.2d 221. The facts are not analogous to the case at bar. Plaintiff was driving his motorcycle at a speed of from 70 to 80 miles pe......
-
Wiese v. Hoffman
...can be brought to a stop with a reasonable degree of celerity. This accords with frequent pronouncements by us. See Lynes v. Schmolt, 241 Iowa 1303, 1306, 45 N.W.2d 221, 222, and citations; Clayton v. McIlrath, 241 Iowa 1162, 1169, 44 N.W.2d 741, 745, . * * * We have frequently pointed out ......
-
Schneider v. Swaney Motor Car Co.
...likewise the ability to divert or change its course may be properly involved in the question of control.' See also Lynes v. Schmolt, 241 Iowa 1303, 1306, 45 N.W.2d 221, 222; Ehrhardt v. Ruan, Under the facts here the question of whether Quick had the truck under proper control was for the j......
-
Bradt v. Grell Const., Inc.
...likewise the ability to divert or change its course may be properly involved in the question of control.' See also Lynes v. Schmolt, 241 Iowa 1303, 1306, 45 N.W.2d 221, 222; Ehrhardt v. Ruan, supra (245 Iowa 193, 196, 61 N.W.2d 696, In Tillotson v. Schwarck, 259 Iowa 161, 169, 143 N.W.2d 28......