Lyng v. Bugbee Distributing Co.
Decision Date | 13 July 1938 |
Citation | 133 Fla. 419,182 So. 801 |
Parties | LYNG v. BUGBEE DISTRIBUTING CO. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Circuit Court, Osceola County; Frank A. Smith, Judge.
Action by W. Lyng against the Bugbee Distributing Company to recover a balance due on the contract price of potatoes sold by plaintiff to defendant. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
Reversed and remanded.
COUNSEL George P. Garrett, of Orlando, and Lawrence Rogers, of Kissimmee, for plaintiff in error.
W. J Steed and Arthur L. Steed, both of Orlando, for defendant in error.
The writ of error brings for review judgment of the Circuit Court in favor of the defendant in a suit wherein the plaintiff claimed the sum of $719.15, the difference between the contract price of potatoes sold by plaintiff to the defendant and the down payment of $500 made by the defendant to the plaintiff on delivery of the potatoes.
Jury was waived and the case was tried before the Judge. The Judge made findings of fact as follows:
We, having considered the entire record, reach the conclusion that Bugbee Distributing Company, through its agent and representative, purchased from Lyng a certain lot of potatoes for and at the agreed price of $2.05 per bushel crate for No. 1 potatoes and $1.70 per bushel crate for No. 2 potatoes, less $40 to be retained out of purchase price by Bugbee Distributing Company, f. o. b. cars Kissimmee, Florida, and paid cash on the purchase $500.00; and that the aggregate amount to be paid was to be determined by the number of bushels of No. 1 potatoes and the number of bushels of No. 2 potatoes as checked and graded at destination.
We further find that according to the accounts sales and by the testimony, 'the car contained by actual unloading check 319 crates of No. Ones and 356 crates of No. Twos.'
The finding by the Judge, we hold, injected an element into this case which has no place here....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
International Erectors v. Wilhoit Steel Erectors & R. Serv.
...Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 604; Hamilton Const. Co. v. Board of Public Instruction, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 729, 731; Lyng v. Bugbee Distributing Co., 1938, 133 Fla. 419, 182 So. 801, 802; Hurley v. Werley, Fla.Dist.Ct. App.1957, 203 So.2d 530, 537-538; Azalea Park Utilities v. Knox-Florida Develop. Cor......
-
State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Deni Associates of Florida, Inc.
...608 (Fla.1957). Hence, the meaning of a contract is deduced from the unambiguous language employed by the parties. Lyng v. Bugbee Dist. Co., 133 Fla. 419, 182 So. 801 (1938). It is thus foreign to our law to find the meaning of contractual language from the subjective understanding of one o......
-
Hall v. MAAL
...Casualty Co. v. Bows, 72 Fla. 17, 72 So. 278; Atlanta St. A.B.R. Co. v. Thomas, 60 Fla. 412, 53 So. 510. Lyng v. Bugbee Distrib. Co., 133 Fla. 419, 182 So. 801, 802 (1938). A court is "guided first by the language of the contract itself and where the contract is clear and unambiguous there ......
- State v. City of Fort Pierce