Lyon v. Lyon, 26142

Decision Date05 November 1970
Docket NumberNo. 26142,26142
Citation226 Ga. 879,178 S.E.2d 195
PartiesFranklin Nathaniel LYON, Jr. v. Ann Girtman LYON.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Mackay & Elliott, Thomas W. Elliott, Decatur, for appellant.

George H. Carley, Decatur, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

FELTON, Justice.

In this action brought by the father of a minor child against his former wife to obtain custody of the child, the applicant had the burden of showing that the former wife, to whom custody was originally awarded, is no longer able or suited to retain custody or that the conditions and circumstances surrounding the child have so changed that the welfare of the child would be enhanced by modifying the original judgment. Bowen v. Bowen, 223 Ga. 800(2), 158 S.E.2d 233; Beckman v. Beckman, 225 Ga. 693, 694, 171 S.E.2d 135. 'In determining whether or not a material change in circumstances substantially affecting the welfare of a child or children has taken place, 'the trial judge is vested with a discretion which will not be controlled by this court unless it is abused * * * When the trial judge is by law made the trior of an issue of fact, this court will not interfere with his finding when there is any evidence to support it.' (citation)' Beckman v. Beckman, supra, p. 695, 171 S.E.2d p. 136.

The evidence adduced at the hearing with regard to the former wife's fitness to retain custody was circumstantial and conflicting in many particulars and did not demand, though it may have authorized, a finding of unfitness. Additionally, there was evidence from which it could be found that the applicant was, by his own admission, in need of psychiatric treatment, that he had made threats on his former wife's life and, hence, that he was no more fit to have custody than she.

Therefore, the trial court did not err in its judgment refusing to modify the former judgment with respect to custody and visitation rights.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Anderson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 20 Septiembre 1974
    ...by a reviewing court if there is any evidence to support it.' West v. West, 228 Ga. 397, 398, 185 S.E.2d 763, 765. See also Lyon v. Lyon, 226 Ga. 879, 178 S.E.2d 195; Givens v. Gray, 126 Ga.App. 309, 310, 190 S.E.2d 607; Guardian of Ga. v. Granite Equipment Leasing Corp., 130 Ga.App. 514, 5......
  • Burnham v. Burnham
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 4 Junio 2019
    ...to show affirmatively a change in circumstances that would free the case from the former adjudication."); see also Lyon v. Lyon , 226 Ga. 879, 178 S.E.2d 195 (1970) (burden is on party seeking change in custody); Mink v. Mink , 195 Ga. App. 760, 762 (3), 395 S.E.2d 237 (1990) (same) (physic......
  • Guardian of Georgia, Inc. v. Granite Equipment Leasing Corp.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 7 Enero 1974
    ...of an issue of fact the appellate courts will not interfere with his finding when there is any evidence to support it. Lyon v. Lyon, 226 Ga. 879, 178 S.E.2d 195. 2. The third enumeration of error is based on the following question and answer: 'Q. Mr. McGonigle, I show you a document marked ......
  • Pitts v. State, 26136
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 5 Noviembre 1970
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT