Lyon v. State, A97A1947
Citation | 495 S.E.2d 899,230 Ga.App. 264 |
Decision Date | 21 January 1998 |
Docket Number | No. A97A1947,A97A1947 |
Parties | , 98 FCDR 437 LYON v. STATE of Georgia. |
Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
Ratcliffe, Smith & Rose, Charles P. Rose, Jr., Hinesville, for appellant.
Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, Carole E. Wall, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
The State filed a forfeiture action against a pickup truck owned by appellant Betty Lyon, alleging that the truck was used by her son, Jesse Dubberly, to facilitate a purchase of cocaine. Lyon answered, asserting, among other things, that she was an innocent owner of the forfeited property. The "innocent owner" provision of the forfeiture statute provides in relevant part: "A property interest shall not be subject to forfeiture under this Code section if the owner of such interest or interest holder establishes that the owner or interest holder: (1) Is not legally accountable for the conduct giving rise to its forfeiture, did not consent to it, and did not know and could not reasonably have known of the conduct or that it was likely to occur." OCGA § 16-13-49(e).
After a bench trial, the trial court found that Lyon knew or reasonably could have known that Dubberly was using the truck to purchase cocaine and ordered the forfeiture of the truck. In her sole enumeration of error, Lyon contends the trial court erred in this finding and in determining that she was not an innocent owner of the truck. We disagree.
In this case, as in all condemnation actions, once the State established a prima facie case for forfeiture of the property, Lyon had the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that she was an innocent owner under the provisions of OCGA § 16-13-49. State v. Banks, 215 Ga.App. 828, 832, 452 S.E.2d 533 (1994). Id. (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Maynard v. State of Ga., 217 Ga.App. 344, 346, 457 S.E.2d 253 (1995).
At trial, the State offered a statement that Lyon gave to the police shortly after Dubberly's arrest. In that statement, Lyon told the police that Dubberly "has had a drug problem for approximately 5 years" and that she had taken the truck away from...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Banks v. State
-
Oasis Goodtime Emporium v. CAMBRIDGE CAPITAL
...fact findings of a trial court if there is any evidence to sustain them." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Lyon v. State of Ga., 230 Ga.App. 264, 495 S.E.2d 899 (1998). On appeal, Oasis enumerates as error only the trial court's finding that the liquidated damages provision was enforcea......
-
BMH Real Estate Partnership v. Montgomery
...N. Benefield. 3. OCGA § 9-11-52(a); Sam's Wholesale Club v. Riley, 241 Ga.App. 693, 527 S.E.2d 293 (1999). 4. Lyon v. State of Ga., 230 Ga.App. 264, 495 S.E.2d 899 (1998). 5. See OCGA § 44-9-1. 6. OCGA § 44-9-54. 7. Keng v. Franklin, 267 Ga. 472, 480 S.E.2d 25 (1997); Burnum v. Thomas, 71 G......
-
Fowler v. Cox, No. A03A2530
...fact findings of a trial court if there is any evidence to sustain them. (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Lyon v. State of Ga., 230 Ga.App. 264, 495 S.E.2d 899 (1998). (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Sam's Wholesale Club v. Riley, 241 Ga.App. 693-694, 527 S.E.2d 293 (1999). And, as ......
-
Civil forfeitures of real property in Alabama: lack of knowledge is power to an innocent owner.
...Corp. v. State, 613 S.E.2d 641, 643 (Ga. 2005) (quoting Mitchell v. State, 511 S.E.2d 880 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)). (118) Lyon v. State, 495 S.E.2d 899, 900 (Ga. Ct. App. (119) Id. at 899. (120) Id. at 900. (121) Id. (122) Id. (123) Id. (124) Lyon, 495 S.E.2d at 900. (125) See FLA. STAT. [secti......