Lyons v. Board of Equalization of City of Ottumwa
Decision Date | 10 April 1897 |
Citation | 70 N.W. 711,102 Iowa 1 |
Parties | JULIUS LYONS, Appellant, v. THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF THE CITY OF OTTUMWA. [*] |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Wapello District Court.--HON. M. A. ROBERTS, Judge.
THIS is an appeal on the part of the plaintiff from the action of the district court in dismissing his appeal from the defendant board of equalization. It is stipulated by the parties that the finding of facts contained in the decree of the court shall be treated as embracing all of the facts, for the purposes of this appeal. That finding is as follows Upon the foregoing finding of facts, the court found, as conclusions of law: (1) That, under the statutes, said board was vested with the discretion of determining the facts, and making a just and equitable assessment of the property in question. (2) That as there was no proof that said discretion was not properly exercised, but, on the contrary, it appeared to have been honestly and fairly exercised, the court had no power to change or modify the assessment as fixed by said board. It therefore dismissed the case, at plaintiff's costs. To which finding, and the judgment entered in accordance therewith, the plaintiff excepted and appeals.
Reversed.
Work & Lewis for appellant.
W. W Epps, city solicitor, for appellee.
I.
It is clear that the conclusions of law of the district court upon the facts found were wrong. This court has several times decided that, in case of such appeals, it is the duty of the district court to make a just and equitable assessment. In Davis v. City of Clinton, 55 Iowa 549 (8 N.W. 423) it is said: "The duty of the circuit court on appeal was to do that which it was claimed the board failed to do,--make a just and equitable assessment." In Grimes v. City of Burlington, 74 Iowa 126 (37 N.W. 107), it is said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial