M. J. Sweeley v. W. H. Sieman
Decision Date | 18 February 1904 |
Parties | M. J. SWEELEY, Appellant, v. W. H. SIEMAN, Appellee |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Sioux District Court.--HON. T. R. GAYNOR, Judge.
ACTION to recover compensation for services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff in behalf of defendant. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
M. J Sweeley and Van Osterhaut & Hospers for appellant.
Orr & Te Paske for appellee.
Plaintiff commenced this action, as in equity, to recover the value of services alleged to have been rendered by him for the defendant in bringing suit against one Snyder upon a promissory note, and in examining certain records in proceedings in which Snyder was adjudged bankrupt. The petition also alleged plaintiff's right to an attorney's lien on the note, which plaintiff asked to be established and enforced by decree of the court. The defendant denied having employed plaintiff in reference to the bankruptcy proceedings, and, as to the note, says it was agreed between them that plaintiff should receive as full compensation for all his services twenty-five per cent. of the amount actually collected by him, and that, if nothing was collected, then plaintiff was to receive nothing. He further pleads, and it is admitted, that no part of the note has been collected.
I. On motion of defendant the cause was transferred and tried to a jury, and on this ruling error is predicated. We think the ruling was correct. An attorney's lien is simply the right to hold or retain in the attorney's possession the money or property of the client until his proper charges have been adjusted and paid. Foss v Cobler, 105 Iowa 728, 75 N.W. 516; In re Wilson (D.C.) 12 F. 235. It requires no equitable proceeding for its establishment. It has been held that the attorney may enforce such a lien as an ordinary judgment creditor may enforce a judgment, or he may proceed summarily against a sheriff who has collected the money on execution, or he may bring a suit at law against the client or the adverse party or both, or if there be a specific fund, he may proceed by motion and order to get the necessary amount set aside for the payment of his claim. See cases cited in 4 Cyclopedia 1020, and note. The plaintiff's claim for services was properly triable to a jury, and there was no error in the order of the court to that effect.
II. The only other...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Simon v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
... ... 364; Anker v. C. G. W. R. Co ... (Minn.) 167 N.W. 278 ... This ... kind of an action is an action at law. Sweeley v. Sieman ... (Iowa) 98 N.W. 571; Barthell v. C. M. & St. P. R. Co ... 116 N.W. 813 ... W. F ... Burnett, for respondent ... ...
-
Senneff v. Sharpe
...finally found due the attorney for his services, which amount may be ascertained by suit on the bond.” The court in Sweeley v. Sieman, 123 Iowa, 183, 98 N. W. 571, which was a suit in equity to foreclose an attorney's lien upon a note belonging to his client, and which was in the possession......
-
Senneff, Bliss, Witwer & Senneff v. Sharpe
... ... due the attorney for his services, which amount may be ... ascertained by suit on the bond." ... The ... court, in Sweeley v. Sieman, 123 Iowa 183, 98 N.W ... 571, which was a suit in equity to foreclose an ... attorney's lien upon a note belonging to his client, ... ...
-
Scott v. Kirtley
... ... client coming into his hands [113 Fla. 646] professionally ... until a general balance due him for professional services is ... paid. See Sweeley v. Sieman, 123 Iowa, 183, 98 N.W ... 571; First State Bank of Le Sueur v. Sibley County ... Bank, 96 Minn. 456, 105 N.W. 485, 489; Cones v ... ...