A. M. L.'s Adoption, In re, 73--410
| Decision Date | 24 July 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 73--410,73--410 |
| Citation | 297 So.2d 840 |
| Parties | In re ADOPTION OF A.M.L., a minor. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Frank B. Watson, Jr. and T. Rankin Terry, Jr. of Roberts, Watson, Taylor & McNeil, Fort Myers, for appellants.
Sheppard & Johnson by Emmet B. Anderson, Fort Myers, for appellee.
This is an appeal from a brief order denying, without ascription of reason, the petition of foster parents to adopt a small child who has been in their care since she was two months old. The child's mother was married at the time of the birth and both the mother and her husband have consented to the adoption. A man who is said to be the natural father of the child contested the adoption. The record before us is scant, but reveals a report of the Division of Family Services which recommends the adoption and reports to the circuit court that the adopting parents are fit persons to adopt this child.
This is among those cases in which the easy way out for an appellate court is to affirm for failure of the appellant to bring an adequate record, but we are mindful of the paramount interest in the welfare of the child as well as the presumption of correctness which attends the trial judge's order. Recently, in Gregory v. Gregory, Fla.App.2d 1974, 289 So.2d 468, this court, speaking through Circuit Judge Alan R. Schwartz, declined to pursue the easy course. There we allowed the appellant an opportunity to perfect the record pursuant to Rule 3.6(l) F.A.R. We follow the same procedure here. If it is necessary to reconstruct the record, provision is made by Rule 3.6(l) F.A.R. of a means whereby the appellant may do so. See Travelers Insurance Co. v. Agricultural Delivery Service, Inc., Fla.App.2d 1972, 262 So.2d 210; Agricultural Delivery Service, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance Co., Fla.App.2d 1972, 269 So.2d 429.
In the interest of this child's welfare, we allow the appellant 30 days within which to furnish an adequate record. If the record of proceedings in the trial court must be reconstructed, additional time will be allowed upon motion addressed to the trial court.
Ordered accordingly.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Payne
...concession before the trial judge. In the connection see: Gregory v. Gregory, 289 So.2d 468 (Fla.2nd D.C.A.1974); In re Adoption of A.M.L., 297 So.2d 840 (Fla.2nd D.C.A.1974).' Thereafter, the trial judge has filed a certified response which reads, in part, as '* * * it is the finding of th......
-
Hill v. Hill, SC00-1440.
...seeks review of Hill v. Hill, 765 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with In re Adoption of A.M.L., 297 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), and Gregory v. Gregory, 289 So.2d 468, 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). She relies on article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Consti......
-
Kutlesic v. Guardianship of Kutlesic, 89-1112
...proceedings, jurisdiction is relinquished for that purpose. See Jones v. Jones, 359 So.2d 579 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); In re Adoption of A.M.L., 297 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). ...
-
Jones v. Jones, HH-425
...Service, 262 So.2d 210 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972); Jackson v. Granger Lumber Co., 275 So.2d 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); In re Adoption of A. M. L., 297 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). See also Fla.App. Rule 3.6(l ) and Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(b)(3) (1977 Accordingly, appellant is allowed thirty days from dat......