E. M. Loews, Inc. v. Deutschmann

Decision Date02 July 1962
Citation184 N.E.2d 55,344 Mass. 765
PartiesE. M. LOEWS, INC. v. Tobe C. DEUTSCHMANN et al.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Claude B. Cross, Boston (John M. Reed, Boston, with him), for plaintiff.

George H. Foley, Boston, for defendants.

Before WILKINS, C. J., and SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, KIRK, and SPIEGEL, JJ.

RESCRIPT.

This suit for specific performance was considered in 337 Mass. 42, 147 N.E.2d 832 on an appeal from a final decree following interlocutory decrees taking the bill for confessed. There has been a trial on the merits. The pleadings are not substantially changed. The judge made a statutory report of material facts. The plaintiff had substantial assets. Neither the plaintiff nor its nominee had obtained a license to operate an outdoor theatre on the premises. Under the contract this failure excused the plaintiff and its nominee from taking title. The plaintiff had the 'exclusive option,' nevertheless, to purchase the premises notwithstanding such failure. The option provision, properly construed, required the plaintiff to give its own mortgage note with prescribed terms for $160,000. The plaintiff was unwilling to give its own note. The alleged tender of a note with different terms by its corporate nominee, organized to operate a theatre but having no license to do so and having assets of only $1,000, was insufficient to put the defendant in default. For this reason, and for others not discussed, the bill was rightly dismissed.

Decree affirmed with costs of this appeal.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Clayman v. Goodman Properties, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • December 13, 1973
    ...N.E. 481, 483 (1926); Salmon Lake Seed Co. v. Frontier Trust Co., 130 Me. 69, 153 A. 671, 673-674 (1931); E. M. Loews, Inc. v. Deutschmann, 344 Mass. 765, 184 N.E.2d 55, 56 (1962); D. C. Hardy Implement Co. v. South Bend Iron Works, 129 Mo. 222, 31 S.W. 599 (1895); Kutschinski v. Thompson, ......
  • Lee v. Ravanis
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 13, 1965
    ...more logically interpreted as meaning the nominee are arts. 8A and 12. 2 The defendants rely on our decision in E. M. Loew's, Inc. v. Deutschmann, 344 Mass. 765, 184 N.E.2d 55, S.C., 337 Mass. 42, 147 N.E.2d 832. They ignore the factual situation in that case which makes it readily distingu......
  • Edward Swartz, Inc. v. Saunders
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • July 2, 1962

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT