Machicek v. Barcak
Decision Date | 14 April 1943 |
Docket Number | No. 8056.,8056. |
Parties | MACHICEK et ux. v. BARCAK. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Moss & Moss, of La Grange, for plaintiff in error.
Fertsch & Fertsch, Chas. Fertsch, Marvin D. Fertsch, and C. L. Stavinoha, all of Hallettsville, for defendant in error.
This is a suit for debt and foreclosure of a lien on land. Foreclosure of the lien was resisted on the claim that the lien securing a part of the debt was attempted to be created after the land had become defendants' homestead, in violation of Article XVI, Section 50, of our Constitution, Vernon's Ann.St.
The tract of land in question was originally owned and occupied by Joseph Machicek and his wife, Johanna, as their homestead. On August 8, 1922, after the death of Johanna Machicek, intestate, Joseph Machicek and four of their five children conveyed the land to August Machicek, the fifth child, for a recited consideration of $6,000, which was made up of cash, $2,400, and credit of $600 for August Machicek's inherited interest in the land, and five notes for $600 each, payable to Joseph Machicek. The deed further provided: "And as a further consideration herein, the said August Machicek obligates and binds himself to take care of and provide the necessary food and shelter for the said Joseph Machicek, during his lifetime, the said Joseph Machicek shall build him a small house upon said herein conveyed premises and shall have all the privileges upon said property and premises as may be necessary for the comfort and convenience of said Joseph Machicek, * * *."
After describing the land, the deed provided: "The grantor herein Joseph Machicek reserves unto himself during his natural life the conditions and reservations made in the consideration clause herein, and upon his death the same to end, cease, and determine and to revert to the then present owner of the herein conveyed property."
The deed expressly reserved a vendor's lien "until the above described notes and reservations are fully paid and carried out." August Machicek and his wife occupied the land thereafter as their homestead.
On October 8, 1924, Joseph Machicek and August Machicek and his wife signed and acknowledged an instrument denominated an "amended deed." This instrument referred to and described the deed of August 8, 1922, and provided:
The instrument provided that a vendor's lien was retained "until the above described notes and all interest are paid in full," and concluded: "This being an amended Deed and shall not vitiate nor change any other terms or considerations stated in the former deed except as herein stated."
The evidence shows that after the execution of the original deed August Machicek took care of his father and provided for his support. In September, 1925, Joseph Machicek went...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Uptmor v. Janes
...Brooks v. Young, 60 Tex. 32; Clements v. Lacy, 51 Tex. 150; Dickson et al. v. Allen, Tex.Civ. App., 24 S.W. 661; Machicek et ux. v. Barcak, 141 Tex. 165, 170 S.W.2d 715; Evans v. Marlow et al., Tex.Civ.App., 149 S.W. 347; Hill et al. v. Wright et ux., Tex.Civ.App., 30 S.W.2d 812; Dyess et u......
-
In re Freytag
...the burden on the homestead for purposes other than are necessary for the readjustment of the outstanding obligation. Machicek v. Barcak, 170 S.W.2d 715, 717 (Tex.1943). The note and deed of trust lien held by InterFirst involved a debt secured by a purchase-money lien on One Dorset Place. ......
-
Benchmark Bank v. Crowder
...renew, rearrange, and readjust the encumbering obligation to prevent a loss of the homestead through foreclosure. Machicek v. Barcak, 141 Tex. 165, 170 S.W.2d 715, 717 (1943). We hold that the Bank was contractually and equitably subrogated to the federal government's tax lien against the C......
- Wohlfahrt v. Holloway