Macias v. State, 97-1260
| Decision Date | 06 May 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-1260,97-1260 |
| Citation | 708 So.2d 1044 |
| Parties | 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1143 Carlos MACIAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Larry Schack, Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-2513CF.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bernard S. Fernandez, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
We affirm the trial court's post-sentencing designation of appellant as a sexual predator finding there to be no violation of the double jeopardy clause. See Kansas v. Hendricks, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2072, 138 L.Ed.2d 501 (1997); see also Fletcher v. State, 699 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Further, we find that the state presented the necessary statutory predicate in order to designate appellant a sexual predator.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sheppard v. State
...jeopardy. This argument has been expressly rejected. See Collie v. State, 710 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); see also Macias v. State, 708 So.2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We note that Collie acknowledged that the retrospective application of employment restrictions applicable to sexual pred......
- Walker v. State, 96-3904