Mack v. City of New York
| Decision Date | 04 October 1999 |
| Citation | 696 N.Y.S.2d 206,265 A.D.2d 308 |
| Parties | YVETTE MACK et al., Appellants,<BR>v.<BR>CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiffs' decedent, Roosevelt Mack, drowned on August 8, 1996, in Coney Island Creek near a public school. On December 5, 1996, the plaintiffs served a notice of claim on the City of New York, the New York City Board of Education and the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (hereinafter referred to collectively as the City) alleging conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death. The notice of claim was rejected by the City on the ground that it was not served within 90 days of the occurrence. Nearly a year later, on November 5, 1997, the plaintiffs simultaneously served a notice of claim, moved for leave to serve a late notice of claim with respect to the claim alleging conscious pain and suffering, and filed a summons and complaint. There is no dispute that the November 5, 1997, notice of claim was timely with respect to the wrongful death claim, as it was served within 90 days of the appointment of a representative of the decedent's estate (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]).
We conclude that the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion, inter alia, in denying the plaintiffs' motion. A cause of action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering is materially distinct from a cause of action to recover damages for wrongful death, and the plaintiffs were required to serve a notice of claim within 90 days of the occurrence (see, Jae Woo Yoo v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 239 AD2d 267). The plaintiffs failed to offer a reasonable excuse for the delay of nearly a year in requesting permission to serve a late notice of claim, after the December 5, 1996, notice of claim was rejected as untimely, and they failed to demonstrate that the defendants had actual knowledge of the nature of the claim within 90 days of the accident (see, Johnson v County of Suffolk, 238 AD2d 480; Joseph v New York City Tr. Auth., 237 AD2d 255; Matter of Shapiro v County of Nassau, 208 AD2d 545; General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]).
The plaintiffs may not rely on the December 5, 1996, notice of claim to establish actual knowledge, since it was served without leave of court and was therefore a nullity (see, Kokkinos v Dormitory Auth., 238 AD2d 550). Although the plaintiffs...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Werner v. Nyack Union Free Sch. Dist.
...and repair of the premises ( see Matter of Carpenter v. City of New York, 30 A.D.3d at 595, 817 N.Y.S.2d 155; Mack v. City of New York, 265 A.D.2d 308, 309, 696 N.Y.S.2d 206; Matter of Guiliano v. Town of Oyster Bay, 244 A.D.2d 408, 409, 664 N.Y.S.2d 314; Matter of DiBella v. City of New Yo......
-
Nappi v. County of Suffolk
...Municipal Law § 50-e[1][a]; Mandel v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 43 A.D.3d 1005, 841 N.Y.S.2d 468; Mack v. City of New York, 265 A.D.2d 308, 696 N.Y.S.2d 206), and their late service without leave of court was a nullity ( see Maxwell v. City of New York, 29 A.D.3d 540, 815 N.Y.S.2......
-
Katsiouras v. City of N.Y.
...Hous. Auth., 38 A.D.3d 675, 831 N.Y.S.2d 515;Maxwell v. City of New York, 29 A.D.3d 540, 541, 815 N.Y.S.2d 133;Mack v. City of New York, 265 A.D.2d 308, 309, 696 N.Y.S.2d 206). Furthermore, the petitioners failed to proffer any other evidence that was sufficient to provide the respondents w......
-
Rosenblatt v. N.Y.C. Health & Hosps. Corp.
...claim as alleged a wrongful death claim timely served nunc pro tunc (see General Municipal Law § 50–e[1] [a] ; Mack v. City of New York, 265 A.D.2d 308, 308–309, 696 N.Y.S.2d 206 ). Furthermore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the petition wh......