Mack v. Moore

Decision Date04 January 1989
Docket NumberNo. 490P88,490P88
Citation377 S.E.2d 225,323 N.C. 704
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesNancy S. MACK v. Donald T. MOORE, M.D., Donald T. Moore, M.D., P.A., Arthur Vernon Stringer, M.D., John T. Daniel, Jr., M.D., John T. Daniel, Jr., M.D., P.A., Lloyd B. Minor, M.D., and J.D. Siefker, M.D.
ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. § 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of January 1989."

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Bourlon, COA04-245.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • 16 August 2005
    ...... Shelton v. Morehead Memorial Hospital, 318 N.C. 76, 80, 347 S.E.2d 824, 827 (1986); Mack v. Moore, 91 N.C.App. 478, 480, 372 S.E.2d 314, 316 (1988), disc. review denied, 323 N.C. 704, 377 S.E.2d 225 (1989). However, by order issued 25 ......
  • Sharpe v. Worland
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • 3 December 1999
    ......Mack v. Moore, 91 N.C.App. 478, 480, 372 S.E.2d 314, 316 (1988), disc. rev. denied, 323 N.C. 704, 377 S.E.2d 225 (1989); Benfield v. Benfield, 89 N.C.App. ......
  • Whitaker v. Whitaker, No. COA06-465 (N.C. App. 2/6/2007)
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 6 February 2007
    ...... Court, therefore, has discretion under Rule 21 to "treat [a] purported appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and address the merits." Mack v. Moore, 91 N.C. App. 478, 480, 372 S.E.2d 314, 316 (1988), disc. review denied, 323 N.C. 704, 377 S.E.2d 225 (1989). See also Brown v. City of ......
  • Nicholson v. Thom
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 16 August 2011
    ......Musselwhite, for plaintiff-appellee.          Young Moore and Henderson P.A., by William P. Daniell, Elizabeth P. McCullough, and Kelly E. Street, for defendant-appellant.         ERVIN, Judge. ...Worland, 351 N.C. 159, 163, 522 S.E.2d 577, 579 (1999); accord Mack v. Moore, 91 N.C. App. 478, 480, 372 S.E.2d 314, 316 (1988) (stating that, "[a]s a general rule, an order compelling discovery is not immediately ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT