Macmurphy v. South Carolina Dept. of Highways and Public Transp.

Decision Date28 March 1988
Docket NumberNo. 22849,22849
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesMayme W. MACMURPHY, Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION; Paul Parrish, Jr., d/b/a Interstate Wrecker Service; Roger L. Wilson; and Rim Back Storage Company, Defendants, of whom South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation is Respondent. and Mayme W. MACMURPHY as Executrix of the Estate of H.E. Macmurphy, Jr., Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION; Paul Parrish, Jr., d/b/a Interstate Wrecker Service; Roger L. Wilson; and Rim Back Storage Company, Defendants, of whom South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation is Respondent.

Julius W. McKay and Richard C. Detwiler, of Haynsworth, Marion, McKay & Guerard, Columbia, for appellant.

William U. Gunn and Robert M. Barrett, of Holcombe, Bomar, Wynn & Gunn, Spartanburg, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Mayme W. Macmurphy appeals a circuit court decision granting respondent, South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation's (Highway Department), motion to strike punitive damages. The circuit court ruled that punitive damages are not recoverable against an agency of the state. We affirm the decision of the circuit court.

Appellant and her husband, Herbert E. Macmurphy, Jr., exited Interstate 85 to access U.S. 221. As they proceeded onto U.S. 221, their automobile lost traction and stalled. A tractor-trailer operated by John A. Weaver collided with the Macmurphy's stalled vehicle and injured them. Mr. and Mrs. Macmurphy were taken to Spartanburg General Hospital where Mr. Macmurphy died four days later.

Prior to the Macmurphy's accident, a Rim Back Storage Company's tractor-trailer had jackknifed and spilled diesel fuel onto the exit ramp leading to U.S. 221. The Highway Department allowed the fuel to remain on the exit ramp, did not place warning signs along the roadway, or sand on the road. Appellant asserts that the respondent's negligence, recklessness and willfulness caused the accident.

Appellant avers that the trial court erroneously ruled that the Highway Department is immune from payment of punitive damages. Specifically, appellant asserts that actual and punitive damages are recoverable against a state agency by virtue of this court's decision in McCall v. Batson, 285 S.C. 243, 329 S.E.2d 741 (1985). McCall abrogated sovereign immunity but restricted recovery "in any case currently pending or in those filed on or before July 1, 1986," to the limits of the defendant's liability insurance coverage. Id., 329 S.E.2d at 743.

In support of her position, appellant argues that the overruling of McKenzie v. McKenzie, 276 S.C. 461, 279 S.E.2d 609 (1981), by McCall v. Batson, supra, permits a plaintiff to recover punitive damages from the state not in excess of its liability insurance coverage. We disagree. In McKenzie, this Court disallowed the recovery of punitive damages upon the ground of sovereign immunity. The McCall decision simply abolished sovereign immunity and did not address the issue of the recovery of punitive damages.

"[I]n the absence of statutory authority, there is no right to recover exemplary or punitive damages against a municipal corporation ... or state ..." See generally, 57 Am.Jur.2d, Municipal, Etc., Tort Liability, § 318. Cf., Clarke v. City of Greer, 231 S.C. 327, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Whitley v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • April 15, 1999
    ...punish the defendant and to deter unacceptable behavior. See Gamble v. Stevenson, 406 S.E.2d 350, 354 (S.C. 1991); Macmurphy v. South Carolina, 367 S.E.2d 150, 151 (S.C. 1988); Laird v. Nationwide Ins. Co., supra at 210; Bowers v. Charleston & W. C. Ry., supra; see also Gilbert v. Duke Powe......
  • Branch v. City of Myrtle Beach
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 31, 1998
    ...It is true that punitive damages are not recoverable against a state or its political subdivisions. Macmurphy v. S.C. Dep't of Highways & Pub. Transp., 295 S.C. 49, 367 S.E.2d 150 (1988). It is also true that criminal sanctions are inapplicable to municipalities. Nevertheless, the Act does ......
  • Chambers v. Med. Univ. Hosp. Auth.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • June 27, 2011
    ...subject to punitive damages. See City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc., 453 U.S. 247, 267 (1981); MacMurphy v. South Carolina Department of Transportation, 367 S.E.2d 150, 151 (S.C. 1988). Thus, Defendant is entitled to dismissal of Plaintiff s claim for punitive damages. Based on the abov......
  • Robarge v. City of Greenville
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • February 27, 2009
    ... ... Court of Appeals of South Carolina ... Heard December 3, 2008 ... Decided ... service from the Greenville Commission of Public Works (Greenville Water System).1 Appellants ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT