Madden v. Chase
Citation | 320 N.C. 169,358 S.E.2d 53 |
Decision Date | 07 July 1987 |
Docket Number | No. 115P87,115P87 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
Parties | Vincent MADDEN, Custodian for Katherine Ann Madden, UGTMA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. David T. CHASE, Thomas N. Roboz, E.M. Hicks, J. John Fox, James E. Gettys, Harry M. Nacey, Jr., J. Benjamin Bostick, Frank Gabor, Ronald J. Krause and Stanwood Corporation. |
Cansler & Lockhart, Charlotte, Garwin, Bronzaft, Gerstein & Fisher, New York City, and Gross & Sklar, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.
Kennedy, Covington, Lobdell & Hickman, Charlotte, for defendants Hicks, Fox, et al.
Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, Charlotte, for defendant Stanwood.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of July 1987."
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ehrenhaus v. Baker
...to adopt common benefit doctrine to permit attorneys' fee award in case involving corporate merger), disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 169, 358 S.E.2d 53 (1987).Objectors assert that because (1) the common fund doctrine is the only exception to the American Rule in the context of class actions ......
-
In re Litigation, No. COA04-402 (NC 1/18/2005)
...bound by a prior panel of our Court. In Madden v. Chase, 84 N.C. App. 289, 292, 352 S.E.2d 456, 458 disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 169, 358 S.E.2d 53 (1987), we denied an award of attorney's fees sought by a group of plaintiffs filing suit to enjoin a "going private" merger. The plaintiffs i......
-
In re Wachovia Shareholders Litigation
...bound by a prior panel of our Court. In Madden v. Chase, 84 N.C.App. 289, 292, 352 S.E.2d 456, 458 disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 169, 358 S.E.2d 53 (1987), we denied an award of attorney's fees sought by a group of plaintiffs filing suit to enjoin a "going private" merger. The plaintiffs in......
-
Ehrenhaus ex rel. Situated v. John D. Baker, Ii, Peter C. Browning, John T. Casteen, Iii, Jerry Gitt, William H. Goodwin, Jr., Maryellen C. Herringer, Robert A. Ingram, Donald M. James, Mackey J. Mcdonald, Joseph Neubauer, Timothy D. Proctor, Ernest S. Rady, Van L. Richey, Ruth G. Shaw, Lanty L. Smith, Dona Davis Young, Wachovia Corp., COA14-1201
...458 (declining to adopt common benefit doctrine to permit attorneys' fee award in case involving corporate merger), disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 169, 358 S.E.2d 53 (1987). Objectors assert that because (1) the common fund doctrine is the only exception to the American Rule in the context o......