Madden v. Cox, 81-CP-22-212

Decision Date16 July 1985
Docket NumberNo. 81-CP-22-212,81-CP-22-212
Citation286 S.C. 127,332 S.E.2d 102
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesVirginia B. MADDEN, as Executrix of the Estate of Frederick R. Madden, Respondent, v. Stacey E. COX, Roosevelt Cobb, and Long Manufacturing Company, Defendants, Long Manufacturing Company, Petitioner.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

The above entitled cause is pending on appeal, 328 S.E.2d 108, in this Court. It now appears that the Petitioner wishes to withdraw the appeal and moves the Court for an Order dismissing the appeal.

IT IS ORDERED that the above captioned appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Campbell v. Paschal
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 28 de maio de 1986
    ...the discretion of the trial judge. Madden v. Cox, 284 S.C. 574, 328 S.E.2d 108 (Ct.App.1985), petition for cert. dismissed, 286 S.C. 127, 332 S.E.2d 102 (1985). To be competent as an expert, a witness by reason of study or experience or both must possess such knowledge or skill in a busines......
  • Ballou v. Sigma Nu General Fraternity
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 13 de outubro de 1986
    ...the jury to disregard the statements. See Madden v. Cox, 284 S.C. 574, 328 S.E.2d 108 (Ct.App.1985),appeal dismissed, 286 S.C. 127, 332 S.E.2d 102 (1985) (when an objection is timely made to improper remarks of counsel, the trial judge should rule on the objection, instruct counsel to desis......
  • State v. Nathari
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 21 de março de 1990
    ...the weight of the testimony, not to its admissibility. Madden v. Cox, 284 S.C. 574, 328 S.E.2d 108 (Ct.App.1985), app. dism., 286 S.C. 127, 332 S.E.2d 102 (1985). Finally, the trial court permitted the Solicitor to cross examine Nathari's witness in regard to her failure to come forth with ......
  • Wallace v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 18 de outubro de 1989
    ...Craft, Inc., 270 S.C. 453, 242 S.E.2d 671 (1978); Madden v. Cox, 284 S.C. 574, 328 S.E.2d 108 (Ct.App.1985), appeal dismissed, 286 S.C. 127, 332 S.E.2d 102 (1985). Proximate cause does not mean the sole cause; the defendant's conduct can be a proximate cause if it was at least one of the di......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT