Maddox v. Brown, 76798

Decision Date06 October 1988
Docket NumberNo. 76798,76798
Citation374 S.E.2d 222,188 Ga.App. 728
PartiesMADDOX v. BROWN et al.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

W. Ron Bryan, Morrow, for appellant.

Robert T. Romeo, Jonesboro, for appellees.

BEASLEY, Judge.

Defendant Maddox appeals the grant of plaintiff Brown's motion for partial summary judgment. Maddox asserts that the trial court's failure to consider and review both of his two depositions was error.

The Supreme Court in General Motors Corp. v. Walker, 244 Ga. 191, 193, 259 S.E.2d 449 (1979), held: "A deposition need not be introduced in evidence in order to be considered in ruling upon a motion for summary judgment because the Civil Practice Act only requires that it be on 'file.' ... If a trial court indicates in his order granting a motion for summary judgment that the motion is being granted after a review of the record, this court will not hold that he failed to review the relevant portions of a deposition simply because the original of the deposition on file in the case remained sealed and was not opened until after the order granting the motion was entered."

Here the order granting the motion, entered February 2, 1988, recited that it was entered "after reviewing all the pleadings, depositions, briefs and after hearing argument by counsel for both parties." However, the trial judge has informed this court that he did not open Maddox's deposition of June 24, 1987, and did not consider it in making his decision. Thus, because the deposition filed December 18, 1987, was not a part of the trial court's deliberations, Walker is specifically not applicable. Ignoring the sealed deposition constituted reversible error because the summary judgment motion implicated the issue of whether Maddox's counterclaim was maintainable, as well as whether his Yost v. Torok, 256 Ga. 92, 344 S.E.2d 414 (1986) claim was meritorious. See Anderson v. Matich, 186 Ga.App. 84, 86(2), 366 S.E.2d 300 (1988). The judgment must be reversed with direction that the trial court consider it and all pertinent documents and proof before determining whether Brown's motion should be granted.

JUDGMENT REVERSED WITH DIRECTION.

BIRDSONG, C.J., and BANKE, P.J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Dunlap v. First Rock Credit Corp., A89A1677
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 20 February 1990
    ...268 S.E.2d 147 (1980); Light v. Equitable Mtg., etc., 191 Ga.App. 816, 817(1), 383 S.E.2d 142 (1989); compare Maddox v. Brown, 188 Ga.App. 728, 374 S.E.2d 222 (1988). The order recites that it was issued "[a]fter carefully considering the arguments presented by counsel ... and after reviewi......
  • Bishop v. Mangal Bhai Enterprises, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 20 February 1990
    ...the same policy. See, e.g., Light v. Equitable Mtg., etc., 191 Ga.App. 816, 817(1), 383 S.E.2d 142 (1989); compare Maddox v. Brown, 188 Ga.App. 728, 374 S.E.2d 222 (1988). Even absent such a recital, there is the legal presumption that the trial court considered the entire record before ren......
  • Taylor v. Schander, A92A1974
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 5 March 1993
    ...Contractors v. Ga. Fed., etc., Assn., 247 Ga. 730(3), 279 S.E.2d 442 (1981). We take this opportunity to overrule Maddox v. Brown, 188 Ga.App. 728, 374 S.E.2d 222 (1988), and all cases which follow its holding, because it is inconsistent with the holding in Miller Grading in that it reverse......
  • Maddox v. Brown, A91A0185
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 1 July 1991
    ...for summary judgment on defendant's counterclaim. See Maddox v. Brown, 193 Ga.App. 158, 387 S.E.2d 584 (1989); Maddox v. Brown, 188 Ga.App. 728, 374 S.E.2d 222 (1988). Finally, the case proceeded to trial and this appeal addresses the jury ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT