Mader v. Stephenson

Decision Date13 August 1976
Docket NumberNo. 4625,4625
Partiesv. Gladys STEPHENSON, Appellee (Defendant below).
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

Richard A. Mader, pro se.

Stuart S. Healy, of Kennedy & Healy, Sheridan, for appellee.

Before GUTHRIE, C. J., and McCLINTOCK, RAPER, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-appellants were awarded a judgment against defendant-appellee in the sum of $1000 with interest from October 11, 1973, the date of the contract, in the sum of $143.86, for a total of $1143.86.

We shall take appellants' words to describe the scope of their appeal: 'From this judgment the Plaintiffs have appealed the second finding which denied damages.' The second finding mentioned is as follows:

'That while the Defendant's failure to pay the $1,000.00 was unjustified, her actions were not such as to permit recovery of punitive damages.'

In their brief they assert and argue the right to recover certain general items of damage, being $500 as the amount of the fee paid to their attorney for prosecuting this action, and also a claim for $212, being for air transportation to return from Kentucky for the trial, and a $500 estimate of the costs for the time spent in travel, for telephone calls, and various expenses in what they style the 'pursuit of justice,' and a claim for punitive or exemplary damages in an amount not mentioned in the brief but as set out in the complaint as $2000.

Absent statutory authority, or contractual agreement, attorney fees are not recoverable by a party, Werner v. American Surety Company of New York, Wyo., 423 P.2d 86, 88-89; Housley v. Tobin, 41 Wyo. 419, 286 P. 383, 385; Brown v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Cheyenne, 38 Wyo. 469, 269 P. 40, 43; nor are travel expenses in connection with the suit recoverable, Brown, supra. There is no statutory provision for recovery of travel expenses or time for preparation of a lawsuit. Any recovery for costs is purely statutory, Wyoming Central Irr. Co. v. LaPorte, 26 Wyo. 522, 188 P. 360, 362; Mader v. Stephenson, Wyo., 481 P.2d 664, 665-666.

In examining the question of punitive damages, appellants are not assisted by the finding that the failure to pay the amount due was unjustified. That finding is implicit in every finding on a contract where judgment is entered. Although there are several obvious reasons which would require affirmance of this judgment so far as it denies appellants exemplary or punitive damages, it would be improper to discuss them because of one overwhelming reason. There is no right in any party to punitive damages, Malco, Inc. v. Midwest Aluminum Sales, Inc., 14 Wis.2d 57, 109 N.W.2d 516, 520; Syester v. Banta, 257 Iowa 613, 133 N.W.2d 666, 675; Simmons v. Jones, Mo.App., 361...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Tupling v. Britton, 79-31.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • January 24, 1980
    ...516 S.W.2d 209 (Tex. Civ.App.1974); Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tuttle, 208 Va. 28, 155 S.E.2d 358 (1967); Mader v. Stephenson, 552 P.2d 1114 (Wyo.1976). It is clear that the assessment of costs and damages against parties who file frivolous appeals is a well-established Awarding app......
  • U.S. Through Farmers Home Admin. v. Redland
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • February 21, 1985
    ...fees without specific statutory authority or a contractual obligation. Kvenild v. Taylor, Wyo., 594 P.2d 972 (1979); Mader v. Stephenson, Wyo., 552 P.2d 1114 (1976). In this case there is no statutory authority nor a contractual provision relating to the awarding of attorneys' fees. The par......
  • Mince v. Butters
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • September 2, 1980
    ...257 Iowa 613, 133 N.W.2d 666 (1965); Malco, Inc. v. Midwest Aluminum Sales, Inc., 14 Wis.2d 57, 109 N.W.2d 516 (1961); Mader v. Stephenson, 552 P.2d 1114 (Wyo.1976). The court of appeals erred in holding, in effect, that Butters was entitled to a directed verdict on exemplary damages. While......
  • Sheridan Commercial Park, Inc. v. Briggs
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • March 12, 1993
    ...right in any party to punitive damages." Squaw Mountain Cattle Co. v. Bowen, 804 P.2d 1292, 1298 (Wyo.1991) (quoting Mader v. Stephenson, 552 P.2d 1114, 1115 (Wyo.1976)). Outrageous conduct, malice and willful and wanton misconduct have been sufficient to warrant punitive damages. Squaw Mou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT