Maffei v. Com., Dept. of Transp.

Decision Date22 July 1980
Citation53 Pa.Cmwlth. 182,416 A.2d 1167
PartiesLouis John MAFFEI, III, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.
CourtPennsylvania Commonwealth Court

Francis P. Burns, Pittston, for appellant.

Virginia Sirotnak, Scranton, Harold H. Cramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ward T. Williams, Chief Counsel, Harrisburg, for appellee.

Before MENCER, ROGERS and CRAIG, JJ.

CRAIG, Judge.

Louis Maffei seeks review of an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County dismissing his appeal from the Secretary of Transportation's suspension of his driver's license under Section 1547 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547, on the ground that Maffei refused to submit to a blood test.

Maffei was one of the drivers involved in a three-car accident. Officer Goodwin testified that, at the scene of the accident, he observed Maffei behaving in a loud and boisterous manner, in what seemed to the officer to be an intoxicated condition. At the hospital, where the injured Maffei was being treated in the emergency room, the officer placed him under arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol.

At the officer's request, Maffei agreed to submit to a blood test.

According to the officer's testimony, thereafter the technician who was to administer the blood test read to Maffei a hospital form which included a statement providing in substance that soap and water, not alcohol, would be used to cleanse the area from which the blood sample would be drawn.

However, on direct examination Maffei's testimony was that:

"The lab technician came in and before she did the test she wanted me to sign a waiver that the hospital is not responsible this is as far as I understand it, you know, if you get hepatitis or some sort of disease from not cleansing the needle or your arm that they're not responsible for it if you die a day or two from now from the test, nobody's responsible for it. So I plainly told her to kiss my ass."

Not only is there no evidence contradicting Maffei's testimony that the form was a release from liability, but the officer also agreed that the form was a "waiver of rights" or a "waiver of negligence" or a "consent to hold the hospital harmless" or a "release." Although neither party has seen fit to include the form in the record, the testimony on both sides has confirmed its nature as a release.

Moreover, the officer acknowledged that it was "correct" that the lab technician "wanted him (Maffei) to sign the release before anything was done" before the blood test was given.

The trial court determined that Maffei had refused the blood test and that all of the requirements for sustaining a license suspension had been met. See Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Drugotch, 9 Pa.Cmwlth. 460, 308 A.2d 183 (1973). The trial court's decision in a license suspension is not to be disturbed unless its findings are not supported by competent evidence or it made erroneous conclusions of law or its decision exhibits a manifest abuse of discretion. McMahon v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 39 Pa.Cmwlth. 260, 395 A.2d 318 (1978).

Here the Commonwealth's own evidence has established that the blood test was tied to execution of the liability release. Hence,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Zerbe v. Com.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    • May 15, 1996
    ...this conclusion, the Court reviewed numerous Commonwealth Court cases in this area, beginning with Maffei v. Department of Transportation, 53 Pa.Cmwlth. 182, 416 A.2d 1167 (1980) (holding refusal to sign hospital waiver of liability form is not a refusal under section 1547), and divided the......
  • Stack v. Com., Dept. of Transp.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    • October 25, 1994
    ...not occur when a motorist agrees to submit to testing but refuses to sign a hospital waiver form. Maffei v. Department of Transportation, 53 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 182, 416 A.2d 1167 (1980). However, where a motorist is unwilling to submit to chemical testing, the fact that the defendant refus......
  • State v. Spring
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Court of Appeals
    • September 4, 1996
    ...Wis.2d 958, 543 N.W.2d 869 (Wis.Ct.App. Oct. 4, 1995).The same is true in cases from other jurisdictions. See Maffei v. Commonwealth, 53 Pa.Cmwlth. 182, 416 A.2d 1167, 1169 (1980); Commonwealth v. Renwick, 543 Pa. 122, 669 A.2d 934, 938-39 (1996); Zerbe v. Commonwealth, 676 A.2d 294, 297 (P......
  • Village of Lincolnshire v. Follensbee
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 1, 2000
    ...in addition to that of the actual test is not a refusal to take such a test); Maffei v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, 53 Pa. Cmwlth. 182, 416 A.2d 1167 (1980). In Maffei, the defendant was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. Pursuant to the offi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Administrative hearings
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Defending Drinking Drivers - Volume One
    • March 31, 2022
    ...to sign a waiver of liability for the hospital. This issue was addressed in Maffei v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp. , 53 Pa. Commw. 182, 416 A.2d 1167 (1980) where the court held that the defendant did not have to sign a waiver of liability form in order to consent to the test. The Maffei ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT