Maguire v. Moore
Citation | 18 S.W. 897,108 Mo. 267 |
Parties | Maguire v. Moore et al., Plaintiffs in Error |
Decision Date | 08 February 1892 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
Error to St. Louis City Circuit Court. -- Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge.
Reversed and remanded.
Jas. O Broadhead for plaintiffs in error.
(1) In no event can the heirs of the widow take any part of the estate of testator. The word heirs will be held to mean child or children when necessary to carry out the clear intention of the testator. Chew v. Keller, 100 Mo. 369; Haversteck's Appeal, 103 Pa. St. 394; Waddell v Waddell, 99 Mo. 345. (2) The grandchildren take per capita and not per stirpes. Morrill v. Phillips, 142 Mass. 240; Olney v. Hall, 21 Pick. 311.
C. P. & J. D. Johnson for defendant in error.
Maguire the executor of the last will of John S. Moore, deceased, instituted the present equitable proceeding for the construction of said will, which is as follows:
The construction given by the lower court to this will was the following:
That the widow takes one-third of the personalty for life, and one-fifth of the real estate for life; that each of the children living, and the heirs of any deceased child taking per stirpes, are entitled to one-fourth of the remaining two-thirds of the personalty absolutely, with a vested remainder, dependent upon the life-estate in the widow, in one-fourth of the remaining one-third of the personal estate, and that the widow in addition takes a life-estate in one-fifth of the realty. That, upon the death of the last of the children, the realty is to be sold, and the proceeds divided between the heirs of the four children taking per stirpes, and the widow, or, in case of her death, her heirs, taking in the same manner.
That from the proportions going to the heirs of John C. Moore is to be deducted the sum of $ 2,200, and that the remainder of the estate be divided according to the foregoing finding, as follows:
That the legal title to one-third part of the personal estate shall pass to and vest in a trustee when appointed in trust to said Ellen L. Moore during her life, with remainder over to those and in the manner hereinafter specified.
That the legal title to the real estate should pass to and vest in a trustee when appointed in trust for the said Ellen L. Moore, John C. Moore, Amanda V. Long, Helen M. Robinson, J. M. Barrett, Ada Thornton, Anna S. Gale, William Thornton and John Thornton, or, in case of the death of either one of them during the continuation of the trust, then for the heirs of such, for and during the life of Jno. C. Moore and Amanda V. Long.
The court then goes on to declare what portions of the net income of the personal estate, and of the rents of the real estate, shall be paid to the parties respectively in accordance with the construction of the will as found by the court. And that, upon the death of John C. Moore and Amanda V. Long, the real estate shall be sold by the trustee to the best advantage, and the proceeds divided between Ellen L. Moore, if she then survives, and the grandchildren of the testator or their heirs then living, who shall take per stirpes; or, if said Ellen L. Moore does not survive, then said proceeds shall be distributed between her heirs, and the said grandchildren or their heirs per stirpes.
I. Is the construction thus given the will the correct one? is the question presented by the record. By the first item of the will it is provided that: "When all my children are dead, then my estate is to be equally divided between my wife and her heirs and assigns, and the heirs and assigns of my children."
The subject is next adverted to in the last clause of the fourth item of the will, where it is said: "After the death of the last of my children, I desire that my real estate shall be sold to the best advantage, and the proceeds equally divided among my wife or her heirs and my grandchildren, or their heirs living at the time."
An explanation of the testator's...
To continue reading
Request your trial