Maguire v. Tong Wo
Decision Date | 07 January 1884 |
Citation | 5 Haw. 41 |
Parties | J. W. MAGUIRE, FIRE MARSHAL, v. TONG WO. |
Court | Hawaii Supreme Court |
SPECIAL TERM, DECEMBER, 1883.
APPEAL FROM POLICE JUSTICE, HONOLULU.
Syllabus by the Court
Where a statute prescribes that a person violating the provisions of such statute, after written notice, shall be liable to a penalty, a printed circular, warning all persons against violations, but not calling attention to any specific breach found to exist, and not directing any specific alterations is not a compliance with the statute.
J. L Kaulukou, for plaintiff.
C. W Ashford, for defendant.
OPINION
THE plaintiff brings action in the Police Court to recover penalty for breach of fire ordinance, under Sec. 338 of the Civil Code.
The Police Justice held that the defendant had not received legal notice, upon the following state of facts:
The plaintiff delivered the defendant a copy of the following circular:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rathburn v. Kaio
...be implied on the part of the parent. They are in derogation of the common law, and, therefore, subject to a strict construction. Maguire v. Tong Wo, 5 Haw. 41; Lewers & Cooke v. Wong Wong, 22 Haw. 765. “Statutes changing the common law are strictly construed, and it is not further abrogate......