Mahan v. McManus

Decision Date22 May 1907
Citation102 S.W. 789
PartiesMAHAN v. McMANUS et al.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Appeal from District Court, Liberty County; L. B. Hightower, Jr., Judge.

Action by R. C. McManus and others against J. R. Mahan. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

On December 5, 1905, the appellees, plaintiffs below, filed their original petition against George W. Burkett and L. J. Barnes in the ordinary form of trespass to try title to 980 acres of land, specifically described therein, situated in Liberty county, Tex.; and on January 27, 1906, they filed their first amended original petition, which was of the same character and for the same tract of land, against the same defendants and also against S. B. Arrendell, J. R. Mahan, and J. T. McWhorters, alleging that the three last-named defendants reside in Liberty county, Tex. On the same day citation was issued to the sheriff or any constable of Liberty county commanding him to summon S. B. Arrendell, J. R. Mahan, and J. T. McWhorters to appear before the district court of Liberty county, Tex., at the next regular term thereof to be holden at the courthouse in Liberty county on the fifth Monday after the second Monday in January, 1906, the same being the 12th day of February, 1906, then and there to answer plaintiffs' petition filed in a suit in said court on the 27th of January, 1906, wherein R. C. McManus, V. R. McManus, Sadie J. McManus, A. G. McCormick, F. C. Viguerie, Adolph Viguerie, Louis Viguerie, Mrs. Margarite Bodin, Nobert Bodin, Mrs. Alice Viguerie Williams, Mrs. Elvira Viguerie Ulmer, Peter Ulmer, Mrs. Annette Viguerie Bland, William H. Bland, Mrs. Josephine Bourg, F. X. Bourg, and Edward Viguerie are plaintiffs, and George W. Burkett, L. J. Barnes, S. B. Arrendell, J. R. Mahan, and J. T. McWhorters are defendants, file number of said suit being No. 3882. The citation states fully the nature of plaintiffs' demand, as it appears from their first amended original petition, and commands the officer "to deliver to the said defendants S. R. Arrendell, J. R. Mahan, and J. T. McWhorters in person a true copy of this citation, together with a certified copy of plaintiffs' original petition." The return on the citation is as follows:

"Came to hand on the 29th day of Jan. 1906, at 10 o'clock a. m. and executed in Liberty county, Texas, by delivering to the within named defendant in person, a true copy of the citation (together with the accompanying certified copy of the plaintiffs' petition) on the dates and at the places hereinafter set forth, as follows:

                ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Name        |  Date.     |   Time    |          Where Served and Course
                -------------------|------------|-----------|---------------------------------------
                                   |            |           |     Place.    |   Miles.  |   From
                                   |            |           |---------------|-----------|-----------
                S. B. Arrendell.   |            |           |               |           |
                                   |            |           |               |           |
                J. E. Mahan.       |  Jan. 29.  |           |  East River.  |     60    |   Dayton
                                   |            |           |               |           |
                J. T. McWhorters.  |   "   "    |           |               |           |
                -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                

"I actually and necessarily traveled 60 miles in the services of this process, in addition to any other mileage I may have traveled in the services of other process in the same case during the same trip.

                                    "Sheriff _______
                  "By E. J. McKinney, Constable, Prct. No
                                         4, Liberty Co.
                Fees:
                  Serving 3 copy ... $2.25.
                  Mileage 60 .......  3.00.
                                     _______
                     Total ......... $5.25."
                

The plaintiffs dismissed their suit as against G. W. Burkett and L. J. Barnes. Judgment by default was rendered against McWhorters on the 13th of February, 1906. Judgment was rendered against Arrendell on his disclaimer on March 1, 1906, and, on the same day judgment was rendered by default against J. R. Mahan in favor of plaintiffs for the land sued for.

Mahan has appealed from the judgment against him.

Baldwin & Christian, for appellant. W. L. Bingle and Stevens & Pickett, for appellees.

NEILL, J. (after stating the facts).

The first assignment of error is: "The trial court erred in rendering judgment, by default, against this defendant, for the reason that the citation issued for this defendant is wholly insufficient to authorize a judgment against this defendant." We overrule the proposition under this...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Lipscomb v. Wood County
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • March 23, 1927
    ...statement of the rule anywhere than by Judge Neill for the Court of Civil Appeals at San Antonio, in the case of Mahan v. McManus (Tex. Civ. App.) 102 S. W. 789. We quote from that opinion as follows: "Although the name of each follows, it does not appear therefrom, when taken in connection......
  • Lipscomb v. Wood County
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • October 22, 1925
    ...111 S. W. 787, 51 Tex. Civ. App. 237; Kellam v. Trail (Tex. Civ. App.) 185 S. W. 988; Holliday v. Steele, 65 Tex. 388; Mahan v. McManus (Tex. Civ. App.) 102 S. W. 789; Russell v. Butler (Tex. Civ. App.) 71 S. W. 395; Rush v. Davenport (Tex. Civ. App.) 34 S. W. 380; Chamblee v. Hufsmith (Tex......
  • Jones v. Watts
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • June 5, 1944
    ...and a third defendant now deceased. Appellants, however, contend that under a decision of a Texas Court of Civil Appeals, Mahan v. McManus, 102 S. W. 789, the entry is insufficient to show who was served. No appearance was made, and on May 27, 1933, judgment was taken by default in favor of......
  • Home Ben. Ass'n v. Sims, 1157.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 17, 1932
    ...by default. Russell v. Butler (Tex. Civ. App.) 71 S. W. 395; Duke v. Spiller, 51 Tex. Civ. App. 237, 111 S. W. 787; Mahan v. McManus (Tex. Civ. App.) 102 S. W. 789; Kellam v. Trail (Tex. Civ. App.) 185 S. W. 988; Martin v. Hawkins (Tex. Civ. App.) 238 S. W. 991 (error On May 2, 1931 plainti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT