Main Realty, Inc. v. Pagel
Decision Date | 15 June 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 43522,43522 |
Citation | 208 N.W.2d 758,296 Minn. 362 |
Parties | MAIN REALTY, INC., Respondent, v. Howard PAGEL, Appellant. |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
Eckberg, Lammers & Briggs and James F. Lammers, Stillwater, for appellant.
Smith, Juster, Feikema, Haskvitz & Casserly, Wyman Smith and Ronald L. Haskvitz, Minneapolis, for respondent.
Heard before KNUTSON, C.J., and OTIS, KELLY, and SCHULTZ, JJ.
This is a mandamus proceeding to require the building inspector of the village of Woodbury, Washington County, to issue a building permit to plaintiff for the construction of a 'mini shopping center' at 3171 Lower Afton Road in the village of Woodbury. The district court granted the writ and defendant appeals. We affirm.
The permit which is sought is for the construction of a one-story building with a 100-foot front and 50-foot depth, designed to accommodate three retail stores for use as a laundry, meat market, and grocery. Preliminary oral approval was given by the defendant building inspector on September 13, 1971, when a permit fee of $153 was paid. On September 22, the permit was denied by the city council. Thereupon, plaintiff sought and secured from the district court a writ of mandamus compelling defendant to issue the permit.
On appeal, defendant advances numerous arguments for denying the permit. He contends that the property was a subdivision and that plaintiff was required to secure approval of a final plat of the subdivision before a permit would issue; that the property had to be rezoned to qualify as a shopping center district; that a plot plan must be submitted to show structures, parking, driveways, landscaping, screening, and the developer's financial responsibility; that the property in its undeveloped state was highly desirable to the village because of its landscaping and trees; that plaintiff had the burden of proving compliance with the normal setbacks and other zoning and site requirements; that the question of obstructing future street extensions had to be resolved; and that under the village's police power it had discretion to deny the permit if the public welfare, health, and safety were not properly served by issuing the permit.
With the exception of an allusion to providing for the health, welfare, and safety of the village residents, none of the reasons for denying the permit advanced on appeal were set forth in the minutes of the council meeting at which plaintiff's application was rejected. The minutes of that portion of the meeting set forth in full are as follows:
'COUNCIL MINUTES
'Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting was duly held at the Village Office on the 22nd day of September, 1971, at 8:00 P.M.
'PETITIONS, REQUESTS, COMMUNICATIONS
'Mr. Carl Lien of Land Increment Inc. came before the Council with building site plans for a mini-shopping center at the NW Quadrant of I--494 and Co. Road 26.
letter that make the area undesirable for this type of business, and also the Village has been in contact with the State Highway Department on upgrading the I--494 Inter-change going west. Councilman Olander stated that if the new revised plans comply with all current Village Ordinances and Building Codes, there would be no basis for rejecting by the Council. Mayor Bielenberg stated that he was concerned with the vehicle movement and pedestrian traffic crossing the I--494 over pass, mostly the children. Councilman Strong requested the motion be voted on as stated.
'Voting in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Value Oil Co. v. Town of Irvington
...45 (Sup.Ct.1969). Accord, Metro 500, Inc. v. Brooklyn Park, 297 Minn. 294, 211 N.W.2d 358 (Sup.Ct.1973); Main Realty, Inc. v. Pagel, 296 Minn. 362, 208 N.W.2d 758 (Sup.Ct.1973); Enright v. Bloomington, 295 Minn. 186, 203 N.W.2d 396 (Sup.Ct.1973); Shell Oil Co. v. Manchester, 101 N.H. 76, 13......
-
Almquist v. Town of Marshan
...St. Paul, 275 Minn. 440, 147 N.W.2d 571 (1966); Hay v. Township of Grow, 296 Minn. 1, 206 N.W.2d 19 (1973); Main Realty, Inc. v. Pagel, 296 Minn. 362, 208 N.W.2d 758 (1973); Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn Park, 297 Minn. 294, 211 N.W.2d 358 (1973). Without attempting to distinguish or ......
-
Country Ins. Co. v. Agricultural Development, Inc., 15296
... ... The main theme of the appeal is set forth in Country Insurance's brief as follows: ... ...
-
Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn Park
...health or safety or the general welfare of the area affected or the community as a whole.' In a most recent case, Main Realty, Inc. v. Pagel, Minn., 208 N.W.2d 758, 760 (1973), we '* * * In recent years a number of cases have articulated the perimeters of municipal authority in granting or ......