Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-800-335-6202

Malone v. State

Document Cited in 1 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Decision Date03 March 1897
Citation39 S.W. 1118
PartiesMALONE v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

39 S.W. 1118

MALONE v. STATE.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 3, 1897.

Appeal from Collin county court; M. G. Abernathy, Judge. George Malone was convicted of violating the local option law in a subdivision of a county, and appeals. Affirmed.

J. M. Pearson, Smith, Evans & Terrell, and Garnett, Jones & Merritt, for appellant. Mann Trice, for the State.

HURT, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law in a subdivision of Collin county, and prosecutes this appeal. The questions in this case are the same as those involved in the case of Williams v. State (just decided) 39 S. W. 664. On the authority of that case, the judgment herein is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Slack v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 1, 1911
    ...Judge Hurt says that the exceptions need not be negatived in the indictment, further than is done in this case. In the case of Malone v. State, 39 S. W. 1118, Judge Hurt again affirms the rule laid down in the case of Williams v. State, supra. In the case of Loveless v. State, 49 S. W. 601,......
  • Freshman v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 27, 1897

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT