Manley v. New York City Housing Authority
| Decision Date | 18 February 1993 |
| Citation | 190 A.D.2d 600,593 N.Y.S.2d 808 |
| Parties | Robert MANLEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. The NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Millar Elevator Industries, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before CARRO, J.P., and WALLACH, ASCH and KASSAL, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about December 23, 1991, which, inter alia, denied third-party defendant's motion and defendant's cross-motion for discovery of plaintiff's medical records for a period of 15 years predating the accident, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.
This personal injury action, brought by the now 70-year-old plaintiff, Robert Manley, seeks damages for injuries sustained on September 23, 1981, when he stepped into an elevator in a building owned by defendant New York City Housing Authority and maintained by third-party defendant Millar Elevator Industries, Inc., and fell into an open shaft. Plaintiff sustained injuries to his head, lower back, and lower left extremities, and was admitted to Metropolitan Hospital on an emergency basis. He remained hospitalized for seven days.
In this now decade-old lawsuit, defendant and third-party defendant (collectively "defendants") assert that there are "possible alcoholism records" which may have some bearing on the medical testimony with respect to plaintiff's neurological condition. On this basis, they seek to discover plaintiff's entire medical records for 15 years preceding the accident.
While discovery should be liberal, the information sought must be "material and necessary", and meet a test of "usefulness and reason" (Allen v. Crowell-Collier Pub. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403, 406, 288 N.Y.S.2d 449, 235 N.E.2d 430). Here, defendants have failed to provide a foundation to warrant discovery of the extent and breadth demanded. Their motions are unaccompanied by any affidavits from medical experts attesting to even a potential link between the injuries claimed by defendant and a history of chronic alcoholism. As such, we are presented with nothing other than "hypothetical speculations calculated to justify a fishing expedition" (Ministers of Ref. Prot. Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, 59 N.Y.2d 170, 175, 464 N.Y.S.2d 406, 451 N.E.2d 164). Moreover, assuming, arguendo, that any of the physical conditions which plaintiff attributes to his fall may bear some...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Forman v. Henkin
...expedition’ " (Budano v. Gurdon, 97 A.D.3d 497, 499, 948 N.Y.S.2d 612 [1st Dept.2012], quoting Manley v. New York City Hous. Auth., 190 A.D.2d 600, 601, 593 N.Y.S.2d 808 [1st Dept.1993] ).This Court has consistently applied these settled principles in the context of discovery requests seeki......
-
Raskin v. N.Y. Methodist Hosp.
...and her ophthalmologic, dermatologic and orthopedic condition resulting from a 2007 slip and fall (Manley v New York City Hous. Auth., 190 A.D.2d 600 [1st Dcpt 1993]; Gill v Mancino, 8 A.D.3d 340 |2d Dept 2004]). However, die physician-patient privilege "seeks to protect... and thereby fost......
-
Raskin v. N.Y. Methodist Hosp.
...and her ophthalmologic, dermatologic and orthopedic condition resulting from a 2007 slip and fall (Manley v New York City Hous. Auth., 190 A.D.2d 600 [1st Dcpt 1993]; Gill v Mancino, 8 A.D.3d 340 |2d Dept 2004]). However, die physician-patient privilege "seeks to protect... and thereby fost......
-
AQ Asset Mgmt. LLC v. Levine
...the information sought must be material and necessary, and meet a test of usefulness and reason” (Manley v. New York City Hous. Auth., 190 A.D.2d 600, 600, 593 N.Y.S.2d 808 [1st Dept.1993] [internal quotation marks omitted] ). The negotiations between nonparties Allen/Orchard and Kenrock fo......