Mann-Stack v. Homeside Lending, Inc.
Decision Date | 25 April 2008 |
Docket Number | No. 2D07-689.,2D07-689. |
Citation | 982 So.2d 72 |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Parties | Sandra MANN-STACK, Appellant, v. HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.; Westlake Village Civic Association, Inc.; Greenwood Trust Company; American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.; Arthur Andersen and Company; Battaglia, Ross, Dicus & Wein, P.A., f/k/a Battaglia, Ross, Hastings and Dicus; Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.; United States of America, Department of Treasury; Swissotel, Atlanta; and Peter G. Stack, Appellees. |
Sandra Mann-Stack, pro se.
Forrest G. McSurdy of Stern & McSurdy, P.A., Plantation, for Appellee, Homeside Lending, Inc.
No appearance for remaining Appellees.
This is an appeal from a postjudgment order of the trial court to the clerk of court to issue a certificate of title on a foreclosed home that was sold at public auction and an order to disburse funds held in the court's registry. Sandra Mann-Stack is the foreclosed homeowner, and Homeside Lending, Inc., is the foreclosing mortgage holder.1 We find no merit in the argument related to the certificate of title and affirm as to that portion of the order without further discussion. Additionally, for the reason discussed below, we conclude the trial court did not err in ordering a portion of the funds from the sale of the foreclosed home disbursed to Homeside.
The underlying foreclosure case has a convoluted procedural history laid out in Stack v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 976 So.2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Since the initial judgment of foreclosure in 1999, Homeside had, on several occasions, sought to amend the final judgment of foreclosure to increase the amount of attorney's fees due. In the most recent case, Ms. Mann-Stack and her husband appealed the order of the trial court amending the final judgment once again to increase the amount of attorney's fees due Homeside, and this court reversed and remanded, concluding that Homeside was not entitled to more than $16,855.55 in attorney's fees. Id. at ___. After the notice of appeal was filed in that case, Homeside filed a motion in the trial court for disbursement of part of the funds from the sale of the home to satisfy the most recent judgment. The motion was granted and resulted in the order disbursing funds that is on appeal in this case.
"Once the notice[ ] of appeal [is] filed, the lower court [is] divested of jurisdiction to proceed with matters related to the final judgment." Hudson v. Hofmann, 471 So.2d 117, 118 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (citing Wilson Realty, Inc. v. David, 369 So.2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)); see also Palma Sola Harbour Condo., Inc. v. Huber, 374 So.2d 1135, 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) ( ). In the absence of a stay pending appeal, however, the trial court retains the power to enforce a judgment that has been appealed. See Horn v. Horn, 73 So.2d 905, 906 (Fla.1954) (); Fitzgerald v. Addison, 287 So.2d 151, 152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973) ().
Ms. Mann-Stack's situation is similar to that of the appellant in Hemmerle v. Federal...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jewell v. Fletcher
...of an order unless he or she files a supersedeas bond and requests a stay pending appeal under Rule 62(d)”); Mann–Stack v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 982 So.2d 72 (Fla.App.2008) (order of disbursement following foreclosure sale was appropriate despite the fact that the foreclosure judgment was......
-
Padilla-Padial v. State
...and sentence (case number 5D13–3356),1 the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion. See Mann–Stack v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 982 So.2d 72, 73–74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (holding that, once notice of appeal is filed, lower court is divested of jurisdiction to proceed with matters r......
-
Stewart v. State
...to rule on the motion. See Padilla–Padial v. State, 152 So.3d 51, 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) ; see also Mann–Stack v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 982 So.2d 72, 73–74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (holding that, once notice of appeal is filed, lower court is divested of jurisdiction to proceed with matters rel......
-
In re Ayoub
...Hewett v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 197 So. 3d 1105, 1105 – 06 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).8 Doc. No. 11, ¶9 Mann-Stack v. Homeside Lending, Inc. , 982 So. 2d 72, 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ("In the absence of a stay pending appeal, however, the trial court retains the power to enforce a judgment that has b......