Mann v. State, 8 Div. 244
Decision Date | 14 May 1985 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 244 |
Parties | Harold Ray MANN v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Gary W. Alverson, Tuscumbia, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Tommie Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Appellant Harold Ray Mann pleaded guilty to the offense of leaving the scene of an accident in violation of § 32-10-1(a), Code of Alabama 1975, and was sentenced to five years' imprisonment, from which he prosecutes this appeal. This section provides as follows:
The indictment, omitting the technical parts, reads as follows:
"... Harold Ray Mann, alias Ray Mann, whose name is otherwise unknown to the Grand Jury than as stated, the driver of a motor vehicle involved in an accident resulting in the death of Brian Keith Posey, Benny Michael Burleson and Barry Layne Hill, did fail immediately to stop such vehicle being operated by him at the scene of the accident, and give his name, address and the registration license number of his vehicle, and render reasonable assistance of the said Brian Keith Posey, Benny Michael Burleson and Barry Layne Hill, in violation of 13-10-1 of the Code of Alabama...."
Motions to dismiss were filed on April 16, and August 3, 1984, pointing out the miscitation of the code section.
There is no evidence that there was ever any ruling on either motion to dismiss. On the 6th day of August, 1984, Mann pleaded guilty. Mann does not cite any adverse ruling as regards his motions to dismiss and none appears of record. A plea to the merits of an indictment waives all waivable defects in the indictment. The question then is, is the citation to the wrong code section such a flaw that the indictment is thereby rendered void? We find that it is not.
The citation to a code section is required by the rules laid down by our Supreme Court. Rule 15.2(b), A.R.Crim.P.Temp., states:
"The indictment or information shall state for each separate offense, other than lesser included offenses, the official or customary citation of the statute, rule, regulation, or other provision of law which the defendant is alleged to have violated."
The comment to the rule states:
In Ex parte Bush, 431 So.2d 563 (Ala.1983), the Supreme Court held:
We accept and adopt the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Bush. The error of failure to cite the correct code section in an indictment does not of itself render the indictment absolutely void. It is therefore an error which may be waived.
Appellant Mann next contends that the court failed to establish that a sufficient factual basis existed for the taking of appellant's guilty plea.
The facts in this case indicated that the victims of the fatal automobile accident met each other on the evening of the accident in Haleyville, Alabama. Thereafter, they went to a disco in Muscle Shoals, where they had drinks. The vehicle occupied by the victims of this accident, Bryan Keith Posey, Benny Michael Burleson and Barry Layne Hill, collided with the appellant's vehicle, left the road and landed upside down in a creek. The cause of death of the three men was drowning.
The vehicles were traveling side by side on Highway 43 south in Colbert County at a speed over the speed limit. The vehicles struck each other, making a dent in the door of the appellant's automobile. The following minute entry was made by the court in connection with this guilty plea:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Talley v. City of Clanton
...Thus, the failure to cite the correct code section in an indictment does not of itself render the indictment void, Mann v. State, 473 So.2d 1225, 1227 (Ala.Cr.App.1985); the error must have a tendency to mislead the defendant or to leave him uncertain of the offense with which he is charged......
-
Heard v. State
...as the mere miscitation of a code section, a voidable defect waived by the failure to assert it in a timely manner. See Mann v. State, 473 So.2d 1225 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). Even if the code section were correctly cited, however, the indictment fails to state any offense under Alabama law and is......
-
Dake v. State
...McKinney is Turner v. State, 584 So.2d 864 (Ala.Cr.App.1990). See also Lyle v. State, 497 So.2d 834 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); Mann v. State, 473 So.2d 1225 (Ala.Cr.App.1985); and Fretwell v. State, 414 So.2d 1012 Our conclusion is also consistent with our recent holding in Knight v. State, 675 So.......
-
Jones v. State
...of the crime if he intelligently concludes that his interest so requires and the record strongly evidences guilt.' " Mann v. State, 473 So.2d 1225, 1230-31 (Ala.Cr.App.1985), quoting Young v. State, 408 So.2d 199, 201 (Ala.Cr.App.1981). Additionally, as stated in Mann, "we cannot disregard ......