Mann v. Workman

Decision Date22 April 1987
Docket NumberNo. 44202,44202
Citation354 S.E.2d 831,257 Ga. 70
PartiesMANN et al. v. WORKMAN.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

J. Curtis Hanks, J. Michael McGarity, Lawrenceville, for Allena Mann, et al.

B. Dean Grinble, Timothy K. Bonner, Charles K. Higgins, Bovis, Kyle & Burch, Atlanta, for David B. Workman.

Michael M. Calabro, Amicus Curiae.

CLARKE, Presiding Justice.

The Court of Appeals held that Mann was not entitled to pursue a common law damage suit action against Workman, a fellow employee, because Mann had accepted worker's compensation benefits for a period of one year. Mann v. Workman, 181 Ga.App. 211, 351 S.E.2d 680 (1986). We granted certiorari and posed the following question: Whether an injured employee is estopped from bringing a common law damage action against a co-employee, where: (1) the injury did not occur out of and in the course of employment, and (2) although workers' compensation benefits were accepted by the injured employee, injury had left him without knowledge of the facts of the injury.

A review of the trial court's order reveals that the court specifically found as a fact that the lunch attended by the parties was a business lunch at which recruitment needs, sources of recruitment, and strategy of recruiting professional people were discussed. Since the trial court made this finding, we now hold that Mann is barred from pursuing a common law negligence action because of the workers' compensation coverage. For this reason, we do not reach the other issues dealt with by the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Kaplan v. Pulte Home Corp.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 21 Julio 2000
    ...are provided by an employer to the employee. Mann v. Workman, 181 Ga.App. 211, 212-213(1), 351 S.E.2d 680 (1986), aff'd, 257 Ga. 70, 354 S.E.2d 831 (1987). However, under the facts of this case, Kaplan was an independent contractor-sole proprietor within the meaning of OCGA § 34-9-2(e) and ......
  • Connors v. Parsons
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 24 Septiembre 1991
    ...from claiming otherwise. Id. at 528. Similarly, the court in Mann v. Workman, 181 Ga.App. 211, 351 S.E.2d 680 (1986), aff'd, 257 Ga. 70, 354 S.E.2d 831 (1987) held that the acceptance of workers' compensation benefits triggers the bar of a civil suit. The court held that having enjoyed the ......
  • Dickey v. Harden
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 31 Enero 1992
    ...bringing this negligence action against his wife's co-worker. Mann v. Workman, 181 Ga.App. 211(3), 351 S.E.2d 680 (1986), aff'd 257 Ga. 70, 354 S.E.2d 831 (1987). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to Mary Case No. A91A1657 In December of 1987, approximate......
  • Associated Hosts of Georgia, Inc. v. Marley
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 8 Septiembre 1987
    ...in 1978.' " Mann v. Workman, 181 Ga.App. 211, 212, 351 S.E.2d 680 (1986) (quoting from the order of the lower court), aff'd 257 Ga. 70, 354 S.E.2d 831 (1987). The Act no longer requires the parties to enter into an agreement approved by the board. Instead, if the employer does not contest t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT