Manning v. State of California
Decision Date | 15 May 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 21484.,21484. |
Citation | 378 F.2d 357 |
Parties | David MANNING, Petitioner, v. The STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Thomas C. Ryan, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Albert W. Harris, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before POPE, BARNES and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.
The appeal of petitioner below from the order denying petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is affirmed, on the order of the District Court, and for the reasons expressed therein. We adopt it in toto:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arnold v. United States
...contended that Arnold requested and was refused the aid of counsel, a prerequisite to Escobedo's application. Manning v. State of California, 378 F.2d 357 (9th Cir. May 15, 1967). 4 Sibron v. New York, 386 U.S. 954, 87 S.Ct. 1042, 18 L.Ed.2d 101; Terry v. Ohio, 387 U.S. 929, 87 S.Ct. 2050, ......
-
Schoepflin v. United States
...with his lawyer and was therefore not entitled to the warning referred to above, as the law stood under Escobedo. See Manning v. State of California, 9 Cir., 378 F.2d 357. We conclude that the trial court did not err in receiving in evidence Schoepflin's Schoepflin argues that the trial cou......
-
Stout v. Cupp
...Escobedo does not render inadmissible a confession given in absence of counsel where no request for counsel was made. Manning v. California, 378 F.2d 357 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 878, 88 S.Ct. 181, 19 L. Ed.2d 169 (1967). Absent request for counsel, Escobedo requires only tha......
-
Smith v. Wilson
...court found, it does not appear that appellant requested and was denied counsel before giving the second statement. Manning v. State of California, 9 cir., 378 F.2d 357; Wilson v. Anderson, 9 cir., 379 F.2d 330, We affirm the denial of appellant's petition for the writ of habeas corpus. ...