Mansfield v. Allen
| Decision Date | 30 April 1885 |
| Citation | 85 Mo. 502 |
| Parties | MANSFIELD v. ALLEN et al., Appellants. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court.--HON. W. H. SHERMAN, Judge.
REVERSED.
A. H. Vories and E. O. Hill for appellants.
Jas. F. Pitt for respondent.
In our opinion, Allen was improperly made a party defendant, but this ought not to authorize a reversal of the judgment, under the liberal provisions of our statute respecting practice in civil cases. Sections 3570, 3582, 3583. See, also, Wescott v. Bridwell, 40 Mo. 146; City, etc., v. Bressler, 56 Mo. 350. We, therefore, modify the judgment by reversing it as to Allen, and affirming it as to Bassett.
I concur in reversing the judgment, but think that the cause should be remanded for a re-trial thereof.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Stotler v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.
... ... 294; Johnson v ... Magruson, 68 Ill.App. 448; Hoye v. Raymond, 25 ... Can. 665; Phelps v. Wait, 30 N.Y. 78; Hewett v ... Swift, 3 Allen 420; Wright v. Wilcox, 19 Wend ... 343; Montfort v. Hughes, 3 E. D. Smith 591; ... Suydam v. Moore, 6 Barb. 358; Wilkins v ... Ferrell, ... 121, 122; Belkin v. Hill, 53 ... Mo. l. c. 492 at 496-7; Cruchon v. Brown, 57 Mo. l ... c. 38; Crowe v. Peters, 63 Mo. 429; Mansfield ... ...
-
Stotler v. Chicago & A. Ry. Co.
...pp. 121, 122; Belkin v. Hill, 53 Mo., loc. cit. 496, 497; Cruchon v. Brown, 57 Mo., loc. cit. 39; Crowe v. Peters, 63 Mo. 429; Mansfield v. Allen, 85 Mo. 502; La Riviere v. La Riviere, 97 Mo. 84, 10 S. W. 840; Orr v. Rode, 101 Mo. 387, 13 S. W. 1066; Sparks v. Transfer Co., 104 Mo. 548, 15 ......
-
Hemelreich v. Carlos
...can amend by striking out her name. Crispen v. Hannovan, 86 Mo. 160; Snell v. Harrison, 83 Mo. 651; Weil v. Simmons, 66 Mo. 617; Mansfield v. Allen, 85 Mo. 502; Purdy v. Garrett, 19 Mo. App. 191. Or by modifying the judgment, and reversing it as to one and affirming it as to the others. Man......
-
Hemelreich v. Carlos
...Cruchon v. Brown, 57 Mo. 38; Snell v. Harrison, 83 Mo. 651; Crispen v. Hannovan, 86 Mo. 160; Mueller v. Kaessman, 84 Mo. 318; Mansfield v. Allen, 85 Mo. 502. here the wife is the sole party to the action, and her name could not well be stricken from the action, or the judgment. The case, ho......
Request a trial to view additional results