Mansur v. Eubanks

Citation401 So.2d 1328
Decision Date30 July 1981
Docket NumberNo. 56597,56597
PartiesMichael MANSUR and Marie Grigsby, Petitioners, v. Mary G. EUBANKS, Jean M. Barnett, and Auto Owners Insurance Co., Respondents.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida

Ronald W. Ritchie of Reeves, Barfield & King, Pensacola, for petitioners.

Donald H. Partington of Clark, Partington, Hart & Hart, Pensacola, for respondents.

BOYD, Justice.

This cause is before the Court on petition for certiorari to review the decision of the district court of appeal in Mansur v. Eubanks, 368 So.2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Jurisdiction is predicated on conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. (1972).

The decision of the district court was to affirm the summary judgments entered in favor of the respondents in this personal injury action brought on the ground of negligence.

Sometime in mid-July, 1976, Marie Grigsby paid a deposit of $25 to Jean M. Barnett in order to reserve an apartment owned by Mrs. Barnett and Mary G. Eubanks. By their informal oral agreement, the apartment was to be available for occupancy, and the term of lease would commence, on August 1, 1976. On July 31, Grigsby began moving her possessions into the apartment. Michael Mansur, who lived in an adjacent apartment also owned by Barnett and Eubanks, helped Grigsby move in. In an effort to get the gas-fueled appliances (stove and water heater) operational, Grigsby and Mansur opened the gas line from outside the apartment. Then they attempted to light the stove and smelled gas in the process. Then they proceeded to try to light the water heater. Mansur struck a match and an explosion occurred. According to his complaint, he was seriously injured.

The district court affirmed the summary judgment by reference to the rule of caveat lessee, under which doctrine it is held that once possession and control of leased premises passes to the tenant, the landlord is not liable for injuries cause by the condition of the leased premises. The court quoted from Brooks v. Peters, 157 Fla. 141, 145, 25 So.2d 205, 206-7 (1946), where this Court said:

It is established law that when a landlord delivers to the tenant possession and control of the demised premises, including the plumbing, drains, and appliances for heating, lighting, and power, the landlord is not liable for an injury to the property or person of the tenant or those on the premises in the right of the tenant, although such injuries are attributable to defects in such apparatus, appliances or fixtures. Thus a tenant may not hold a landlord liable for injuries caused by explosion of plumbing, or heating apparatus on premises, the possession and control of which have been surrendered to him in the absence of fraud or concealment. 32 Am.Jur. 624, 625, § 746.

The landlord's liability is based on his right of control over the appliances and he is not liable for injuries for defects in appliances located on the leased premises if he does not reserve control thereof, and accordingly it has been held that he is not liable for defects in water pipes in an apartment when the only purpose of such pipes is to supply and distribute water for the apartment. On the other hand, he is liable for defects in pipes on the leased premises if he retains control thereof. Tiffany on Landlord and Tenant, Vol. 1, pages 644, 645, par. 92.

Where the landlord surrenders possession and control of the leased premises to the tenant, in the absence of fraud or concealment, the tenant assumes the risk as to the condition of the premises, including the heating, lighting apparatus, plumbing, water pipes, sewers, etc. In other words, the rule of caveat emptor applies, hence the landlord is not liable for any personal injuries or sickness of tenants, although attributable to the defects in the fixtures. See Mansell v. Hands, 235 Mass. 253, 126 N.E. 391, 13 A.L.R. 835, and annotations; Godbrecht v. Beckwith, 82 N.H. 415, 135 A. 20, 52 A.L.R. 858, and annotations.

The district court of appeal noted that its decision was in conflict with Alexander v. Fiftieth Street Heights Co., 334 So.2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). There it was held that a lessor has a duty "to properly inspect the premises prior to the occupancy" and "to furnish reasonably safe premises to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
44 cases
  • Kingston Square Tenants v. Tuskegee Gardens, 91-6029-CIV.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • May 26, 1992
    ...Dist.Ct.App.1979) (Ervin, J., specially concurring) (citations omitted) (emphasis added), quashed and remanded on other grounds, 401 So.2d 1328, 1330 (Fla.1981) (citing Ervin concurrence with With respect to the second argument, written demand is not required where notice is given and the l......
  • In re Std. Jury Instructions in Civil Cases -- Report No. 09-01
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • March 4, 2010
    ...1. This instruction, reflecting a greater duty by landlord to tenant on leased residential premises, was derived from Mansur v. Eubanks, 401 So.2d 1328 (Fla.1981), overruling to that extent Brooks v. Peters, 157 Fla. 141, 25 So.2d 205 (1946). See also F.S. 83.51 (1981), which may impose on ......
  • In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Case—-Report Number
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • May 30, 2013
    ...1. This instruction, reflecting a greater duty by landlord to tenant on leased residential premises, was derived from Mansur v. Eubanks, 401 So.2d 1328 (Fla.1981), overruling to that extent Brooks v. Peters, 157 Fla. 141, 25 So.2d 205 (1946). See also F.S. 83.51 (1981), which may impose on ......
  • Trotter by Trotter v. Chicago Housing Authority
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • November 9, 1987
    ...v. Garwacki (1980), 380 Mass. 162, 168, 402 N.E.2d 1045, 1049; Corrigan v. Janney (Mont.1981), 626 P.2d 838, 840, and Mansur v. Eubanks (Fla.1981), 401 So.2d 1328, 1329-30 (courts of last resort), and Presson v. Mountain State Properties, Inc. (1972), 18 Ariz.App. 176, 177-78, 501 P.2d 17, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Landlord-tenant relations
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Small-Firm Practice Tools - Volume 1-2 Volume 1
    • April 1, 2023
    ...tenant. This latter duty is equiv-alent to the statutory warranty of habitability under Florida Statute 83.51(1). See Mansur v. Eubanks, 401 So.2d 1328 (Fla. 1981). 57. Defendant Ruthless was on notice of roof defects, mold and other unsafe conditions at the Prem-ises but failed to effect t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT