Mantho v. Board of Liquor Control, 33299
| Decision Date | 19 November 1952 |
| Docket Number | No. 33299,33299 |
| Citation | 109 N.E.2d 14,158 Ohio St. 331 |
| Parties | , 49 O.O. 182 MANTHO et al. v. BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL et al. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin county.
Don Isham, Akron, for appellant.
C. William O'Neill, Atty. Gen., and Ralph N. Mahaffey, Ashville, for appellees.
It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Mantho v. Board of Liquor Control, s. 33786
...county. These two cases involve the same questions of law and have traveled together through the courts from the Board of Liquor Control. The Mantho case (No. 33786 herein) arose out of the rejection by the Board of Liquor Control on March 28, 1950, of an application for classes D-2 and D-3......
-
American Book Co. v. Porterfield, 68-649
... ... Upon appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals, appellant's contention that such printing ... ...
-
Colonial Foundry Co. v. Peck, 33030
... ... A decision of the Board of Tax Appeals that flasks, cast iron shapes, weights, and ... ...