Manuel v. the State.
| Citation | 289 Ga. 383,711 S.E.2d 676 |
| Decision Date | 13 June 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. S11A0603.,S11A0603. |
| Parties | MANUELv.The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
289 Ga. 383
711 S.E.2d 676
11 FCDR 1776
MANUEL
v.
The STATE.
No. S11A0603.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
June 13, 2011.
[711 S.E.2d 677]
Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Paige Reese Whitaker, Stephany Julissa Luttrell, Asst. Dist. Attys., Paula Khristian Smith, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Mary Beth Westmoreland, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.Henry Allen Hibbert, Cromwell & Hibbert, Atlanta, for appellant.CARLEY, Presiding Justice.
[289 Ga. 483] A jury returned verdicts finding Ron Manuel guilty of malice murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The trial court entered judgments of conviction and sentenced Manuel to life imprisonment for the malice murder charge and a consecutive five-year term for the weapons charge. Manuel appeals after the denial of a motion for new trial and a motion for reconsideration.*
1. Construed most strongly in support of the verdicts, the evidence shows that, on the evening of December 17, 2005, police officer Taisha Rozier, as she was sitting in her squad car, heard four gunshots from the pathway between Old National Highway and Old National Parkway. She and Officer Hines called in a report at 7:31 p.m. and then headed toward the pathway, which is known as a high crime area due to frequent occurrences of drug sales and drug trafficking. At the Motel Six adjacent to the pathway, someone informed the officers that a body was lying farther down the path. At 8:02 p.m., the officers found the body of victim Kenneth Black about 75 feet up the pathway. The victim had been shot once in the face and three times in the chest. The officers did not find a wallet or any cash on the victim, and his right rear pocket was turned inside out. The two bullets recovered from the victim's body were determined by firearms experts to be .38 caliber hollow-point bullets that had been [289 Ga. 484] fired from the same gun.
A prostitute, Melissa Stephens, had been with the victim in his room at the Quality Inn, also adjacent to the pathway, from around 6:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. when she left
[711 S.E.2d 678]
the victim still alive. During this hour, the victim had left to get $700 from the ATM in order to pay Ms. Stephens.
Rahsean McIntosh, who was 16 years old at trial, and Emmanuel Adkins, who was 17 years old at trial and 15 years old at the time of the incident, were playing basketball in the parking lot of Ashton Chase Apartments, also adjacent to the pathway, when they heard the gunshots. Less than a minute later, they saw a man come out of the pathway with a silver gun in his hand. As the man was leaving the woods, he stepped beneath a light, at which time both boys could see the man's face. Both boys identified Manuel from a photographic lineup as well as in court as the man they saw that night.
Manuel was arrested the day after the murder. During a search of his apartment, the police found a .38 caliber hollow-point bullet, the same type of bullet as was found in the victim.
“When evaluating the sufficiency of evidence, the proper standard for review is whether a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, giving deference to the jury's determination on the proper weight and credibility to be given the evidence.” [Cits.]
Hamrick v. State, 304 Ga.App. 378(1), 696 S.E.2d 403 (2010). In the present case, two eyewitnesses, who were familiar with Manuel, positively identified him as the man they saw running out of the pathway with a gun shortly after shots were heard. Manuel argues that the jury should have rejected the eyewitnesses' testimony because their testimony was internally inconsistent and they lacked credibility. However,[t]hat some evidence offered by a witness seems contradictory to his own or to some other's, or incomplete or uncertain, does not automatically discredit the evidence given by that witness, or others, for it is the function of the triers of fact to determine to what evidence it gives credence.
Simmons v. State, 285 Ga.App. 129, 130–131, 645 S.E.2d 622 (2007). Manuel also argues that...To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Copeland v. State
...on the general grounds embodied in OCGA §§ 5–5–20 and 5–5–21.” Walker, supra, 292 Ga. at 264(2), 737 S.E.2d 311; see also Manuel v. State, 289 Ga. 383, 386(2), 711 S.E.2d 676 (2011) (trial court's use of the Jackson v. Virginia standard of review shows that the trial court failed to apply i......
-
Wofford v. State
...of the testifying witness, which is solely within the purview of the jury.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Manuel v. State, 289 Ga. 383, 385(1), 711 S.E.2d 676 (2011). Accordingly, the evidence was sufficient to authorize a jury to find Wofford guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of child......
-
Lewis v. Odum
...the evidence, and resolve any conflicts or inconsistencies. See Vega v. State, 673 S.E.2d 223, 225 (Ga. 2009); see also Manuel v. State, 711 S.E.2d 676, 678 (Ga. 2011) (explaining testimony of one witness can establish a fact and lack of corroboration goes to weight of evidence and witness ......
-
Lewis v. Odum
...the evidence, and resolve any conflicts or inconsistencies. See Vega v. State, 673 S.E.2d 223, 225 (Ga. 2009); see also Manuel v. State, 711 S.E.2d 676, 678 (Ga. 2011) (explaining testimony of one witness can establish a fact and lack of corroboration goes to weight of evidence and witness ......