Mardis v. Hines
Decision Date | 17 July 1919 |
Docket Number | 792. |
Parties | MARDIS v. HINES, Director General of Railroads, et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas |
H. H Ragon, of Clarksville, Ark., and Jeptha H. Evans, of Boonville, Ark., for plaintiff.
Thos B. Pryor, of Ft. Smith, Ark., for defendants.
This is a suit by plaintiff, Mardis, against Walker D. Hines Director General of Railroads, and the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, for an injury sustained by the plaintiff while being transported as a passenger.
The amended complaint makes the following allegations:
'The premises considered, the plaintiff...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crim v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
...dismissed therefrom." Rutherford v. Union Pacific R. Co. (D.C.) 254 F. 880; Dahn v. McAdoo, Dr. Gen. of Rds. (D.C.) 256 F. 549; Mardis v. Hines (D.C.) 258 F. 945; v. Detroit, G.H. & M. Ry. Co., 208 Mich. 403, 175 N.W. 580, 8 A.L.R. 964; Sagona v. Pullman Co. (Sup.) 174 N.Y.Supp. 536; Castle......
-
Preston v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
...v. United States, 263 F. 543; Act of Congress, Aug. 29, 1916, 39 Stat. 645 (Comp. St. 1974a); Haubert v. Railroad, 259 F. 361; Mardis v. Hines, 258 F. 945; v. Tel. Co., 219 S.W. 107; Cravens v. Hines, 218 S.W. 912; Rutherford v. Railroad, 254 F. 880; Armstrong v. United States, 13 Wall. 154......
-
Hines v. Dahn
... ... v. Cerecedo Hermanos y ... Compania, 209 U.S. 338, 28 Sup.Ct. 532, 52 L.Ed. 821 ... There are well-reasoned cases in the federal courts ... sustaining the views herein expressed. They are ... Rutherford v. Union Pac. (D.C.) 254 F. 880; U.S. v ... Kambeitz (D.C.) 256 F. 247; Mardis v. Hines ... (D.C.) 258 F. 945; Haubert v. Baltimore & O.R. Co ... (D.C.) 259 F. 361; Nash v. Southern Pacific Co ... (D.C.) 260 F. 280; Westbrook et al. v. Director ... General of Railroads (D.C.) 263 F. 211; Hatcher & ... Snyder v. A., T. & S.F. Ry. Co. (D.C.) 258 F. 952; ... ...
-
Geddes v. Davis
... ... A. Coast Line R. Co., 110 S.C. 259, 96 ... S.E. 530; Jensen v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 255 F ... 795; McAdoo v. Burch, 254 F. 140; Mardis v ... Hines, 258 F. 945; affirmed 267 F. 171; Rutherford ... v. Union P. Ry. Co., 254 F. 880; Blevins v ... Hines, 264 F. 1005; Hines v ... ...