Margolin v. United States, 254
Decision Date | 16 November 1925 |
Docket Number | No. 254,254 |
Citation | 269 U.S. 93,46 S.Ct. 64,70 L.Ed. 176 |
Parties | MARGOLIN v. UNITED STATES |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Act Sept. 2, 1914, § 13, as added by Act Oct. 6, 1917, § 2, and amended by Act May 20, 1918, § 1 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 514kk), providing for Bureau of War Risk Insurance, as already amended by Act June 12, 1917 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 514a-514i), providing that payment to attorney for assistance in preparing an execution of papers necessary in presenting claim to Bureau of War Risk Insurance or Veterans' Bureau, its successor, under Act Aug. 9, 1921, § 3 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 967 1/4 b), should not exceed $3, is not limited in its application solely to clerical work and filling out forms or affidavits of claim, so as to permit an additional charge for useful investigation and preparatory work.
Miss Susan Brandeis and Mr. Benjamin S. Kirsh, both of New York City, for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 93-95 intentionally omitted] Mr. Assistant Attorney General Donovan, for the United States.
An act of Congress approved September 2, 1914 (38 Stat. 711, c. 293 (Comp. St. §§ 514a-514j)), provided for a Bureau of War Risk Insurance in the Treasury Department, directed it to insure American vessels, their freight, passage money, and cargoes against war risks, and further authorized it to prescribe necessary rules and regulations. This was amended by Act June 12, 1917, c. 26, 40 Stat. 102 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 514a-514i), so as to provide insurance for masters, officers and crews of American vessels; and the following new section was added:
An act approved October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. 398, c. 105 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 514a et seq.)), again amended the original act, provided for Divisions of Marine and Seamen's Insurance and of Military and Naval Insurance, made definite provision for insuring members of the military and naval forces, and added another new section:
An act approved May 20, 1918 (40 Stat. 555, c. 77, § 1 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 514kk)), amended section 13, above quoted, so that it should provide:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Walters
...had already been decided against plaintiffs: Hines v. Lowrey, 305 U.S. 85, 59 S.Ct. 31, 83 L.Ed. 56 (1938); Margolin v. United States, 269 U.S. 93, 46 S.Ct. 64, 70 L.Ed. 176 (1925); Calhoun v. Massie, 253 U.S. 170, 40 S.Ct. 474, 64 L.Ed. 843 (1920); Hoffmaster v. Veterans Administration, 44......
-
Nebbia v. People of State of New York, 531
...Moyers, 253 U.S. 182, 40 S.Ct. 478, 64 L.Ed. 849; Yeiser v. Dysart, 267 U.S. 540, 45 S.Ct. 399, 69 L.Ed. 775; Margolin v. United States, 269 U.S. 93, 46 S.Ct. 64, 70 L.Ed. 176. A stockyards corporation, 'while not a common carrier, nor engaged in any distinctively public employment, is doin......
-
Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc.
...586, 588-589, 39 L.Ed. 657; Yeiser v. Dysart (1925) 267 U.S. 540, 541, 45 S.Ct. 399, 69 L.Ed.2d 775; Margolin v. United States (1925) 269 U.S. 93, 102, 46 S.Ct. 64, 65, 70 L.Ed. 176, Estate of Goodrich (1907) 6 Cal.App. 730, 732, 93 P. 121.) These decisions establish that--contrary to amici......
-
St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Stuart
... ... and being maintained under and by virtue of the laws of the United States prescribing the liability of common carriers by railroad while ... Ry. Co. v. Jackson, 61 Okla. 146160160 160 P. 736; Pryor v. Williams, 254 U.S. 43, 65 L. Ed. 120. 35 But such employee does not assume extraordinary ... ...