Mariano v. SCHUYLERVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
| Decision Date | 30 October 2003 |
| Citation | 309 A.D.2d 1116,766 N.Y.S.2d 388 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | NICOLE A. MARIANO, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>SCHUYLERVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent. |
When plaintiff was an eighth grade student at Schuylerville Central School, she slipped and fell on dewy grass while running a cross-country course during physical education class. Five years later she sued, alleging, among other things, that the course was negligently designed and that defendant was negligent in its supervision and instruction to students by failing to properly warn of the risks and dangers inherent in this activity. Plaintiff's bill of particulars expounded upon these theories and reserved the right to later allege a violation of a statute, ordinance, rule or regulation.
In response to an expert demand (see CPLR 3101 [d]), plaintiff advised that engineer Ernest Gailor was to testify about the dangers of the course. In his report, Gailor detailed that the narrowing of the path forced runners onto a slippery and steep grassy slope. With the slope having over a 20% grade, the slip hazard increased. As the slip hazard was not readily detectable, the danger was further compounded by the wetness of the grassy surface. Gailor also opined that the course failed to comply with applicable cross-country course standards, citing as authority an article in "Kick!," a running journal which advised that after the gait was established in the first few steps, any disturbance would increase the risk of a misstep.
After reviewing this report, defendant moved, in limine, to preclude Gailor's trial testimony. It contended that he was not qualified to render an opinion as to defendant's liability and that his testimony would not be beneficial to the jury, pointing to Gailor's lack of experience in the design of cross-country courses or in the area of physical education instruction. Defendant further highlighted that plaintiff failed to allege a statutory or rule violation. Supreme Court granted defendant's motion, but permitted Gailor to present limited testimony.
At trial, plaintiff testified that she moved off of the asphalt path onto the grassy section where she slipped because the approaching path was too narrow for both herself and her running partner. Plaintiff's teacher, Elizabeth Sciurba, testified that she designed the course and that she instructed the students to stay on the asphalt path. After hearing testimony from plaintiff's running mate and the limited testimony permitted by Gailor, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals, contending that the limitation of Gailor's testimony was in error.
It is settled that both the admissibility...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Palmatier v. Mr. Heater Corp.
...in his affidavit, the photographs or his measurements was "beyond the ken of the typical juror" ( Mariano v. Schuylerville Cent. School Dist., 309 A.D.2d 1116, 1118, 766 N.Y.S.2d 388 [2003] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Galasso v. 400 Exec. Blvd., LLC, 101 A.D.3d 677,......
-
Utsey v. City of N.Y.
...was the jury's determination, not his. E.g., People v. Ingram, 2 AD3d 211, 212–13 (1st Dep't 2003); Mariano v. Schuylerville Cent. School Dist., 309 A.D.2d 1116, 1117–18 (3d Dep't 2003); Fortunato v. Dover Union Free School Dist., 224 A.D.2d 658, 659 (2d Dep't 1996); Franco v. Muro, 224 A.D......
-
Christoforatos v. City of New York
...611, 457 N.E.2d 717; Jean–Louis v. City of New York, 86 A.D.3d 628, 928 N.Y.S.2d 310; Mariano v. Schuylerville Cent. School Dist., 309 A.D.2d 1116, 766 N.Y.S.2d 388). The admissibility and scope of expert testimony is a determination within the discretion of the trial court ( see De Long v.......
-
Galasso v. 400 Exec. Blvd., LLC
...611, 457 N.E.2d 717;Franco v. Muro, 224 A.D.2d 579, 579–580, 638 N.Y.S.2d 690;see also Mariano v. Schuylerville Cent. School Dist., 309 A.D.2d 1116, 1117–1118, 766 N.Y.S.2d 388;cf. Hendricks v. Baksh, 46 A.D.3d 259, 260, 847 N.Y.S.2d 171). The photographs of the defective condition and the ......
-
Expert witnesses
...372, 670 N.Y.S.2d 978 (1998); Dufel v. Green , 84 N.Y.2d 795, 622 N.Y.S.2d 900 (1995); Mariano v. Schuylerville Central School District, 309 A.D.2d 1116. 766 N.Y.S.2d 388 (3d Dept. 2003); Heraud v. Weissman, 276 A.D.2d 376, 714 N.Y.S.2d 476 (1st Dept. 2000). In general, expert witness testi......
-
Expert witnesses
...to present expert testimony since the evidence of defendant’s guilt was strong); Mariano v. Schuylerville Central School District, 309 A.D.2d 1116. 766 N.Y.S.2d 388 (3d Dept. 2003); Heraud v. Weissman, 276 A.D.2d 376, 714 N.Y.S.2d 476 (1st Dept. 2000). In general, expert witness testimony i......
-
Expert witnesses
...to present expert testimony since the evidence of defendant’s guilt was strong); Mariano v. Schuylerville Central School District, 309 A.D.2d 1116, 766 N.Y.S.2d 388 (3d Dept. 2003); Heraud v. Weissman, 276 A.D.2d 376, 714 N.Y.S.2d 476 (1st Dept. 2000). In general, expert witness testimony i......
-
Expert witnesses
...372, 670 N.Y.S.2d 978 (1998); Dufel v. Green , 84 N.Y.2d 795, 622 N.Y.S.2d 900 (1995); Mariano v. Schuylerville Central School District, 309 A.D.2d 1116. 766 N.Y.S.2d 388 (3d Dept. 2003); Heraud v. Weissman, 276 A.D.2d 376, 714 N.Y.S.2d 476 (1st Dept. 2000). In general, expert witness testi......