Marker v. State, 87-54
Decision Date | 05 January 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 87-54,87-54 |
Citation | 748 P.2d 295 |
Parties | Thomas MARKER, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Leonard D. Munker, State Public Defender; and Wyatt R. Skaggs, Chief Trial Counsel, Laramie, for appellant.
Joseph B. Meyer, Atty. Gen.; John W. Renneisen, Deputy Atty. Gen.; and David K. Gruver, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before THOMAS, CARDINE, URBIGKIT, and MACY, JJ., and HANSCUM, D.J.
This is an appeal from convictions on two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in violation of §§ 6-2-502(a)(ii) and 6-1-104(a)(i), W.S.1977, 1987 Cum.Supp.
Appellant states the issue as:
"Whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of sadomasochistic materials."
We affirm.
On February 24, 1986, Thomas Marker (appellant) was charged with two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Count I was alleged to have occurred on or about December 26, 1985, and Count II as amended was alleged to have occurred on or about February 16-17, 1986. The victim and the crime were the same in both counts: appellant cut the penis of his three-year-old son, Robert. A jury convicted appellant of both counts, and sentence was imposed of seven to ten years on Count I and a consecutive term of ten years probation on Count II.
Evidence to which appellant objected consisted of three exhibits: a magazine entitled "299 Bound Boys," and two photocopied excerpts from a book found with the magazine which described various torture techniques. These three exhibits were seized in a consensual search of appellant's apartment. In fact, appellant had drawn a map to aid the officer in finding the material.
The trial judge denied appellant's motion in limine to prevent the admission of these specified items, and allowed their introduction to show "motive and/or identification." Later, the police officer testified that he had seized the materials and then described the publication "299 Bound Boys." The magazine contains a graphic depiction of boys in their late teens in various painful situations, including having their genitals placed in ropes, chains, and other painful devices. 1
Appellant essentially argues that the admission of this evidence was in error because it was character evidence not admissible under Rule 404(a), W.R.E., and additionally that it should have been excluded as unduly prejudicial under the balancing test of Rule 403, W.R.E. We disagree, finding in the specific facts of this case that the evidence was properly admitted to prove identity under Rule 404(b), W.R.E. 2 At trial, appellant denied committing the offenses, and the general theory of the defense was to blame the mother for the child's injury.
(Emphasis added.) Bishop v. State, Wyo., 687 P.2d 242, 245 (1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1219, 105 S.Ct. 1203, 84 L.Ed.2d 345 (1985).
In Goodman v. State, Wyo., 601 P.2d 178, 181 (1979), this court recognized:
In more recent analysis, in Coleman v. State, Wyo., 741 P.2d 99, 105 (1987), we considered the prior-bad-acts motive exception as admissible in relation to identity:
Wright and Graham, Federal Practice and Procedure: Evidence § 5239, pp. 465-466 (1978) states:
Identity was also at issue in Grabill v. State, Wyo., 621 P.2d 802 (1980), where Rule 404(b), W.R.E. was used to allow evidence of prior bad acts to be introduced in a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ryan v. State
...to do the act charged, and from this mental state it is inferred that he did commit the act." (Footnotes omitted.) In Marker v. State, 748 P.2d 295, 297 (Wyo.1988), after quoting the above language from Coleman, we went on to adopt the following Wright and Graham, Federal Practice and Proce......
-
Pena v. State
...evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts if it constitutes proof of one of the purposes in accord with Rule 404(b). Marker v. State, 748 P.2d 295, 297 (Wyo.1988); Carey v. State, 715 P.2d 244, 248 (Wyo.1986). On appeal, deference is given to a trial court's determination concerning the admi......
-
Lauthern v. State
...liberal attitude toward admitting evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts. Miller v. State, 755 P.2d 855 (Wyo.1988); Marker v. State, 748 P.2d 295 (Wyo.1988). In Miller, we noted several of the above cases and commented that, as far as further extension or expansion of the admissibility o......
-
Mitchell v. State
...848 (Wyo.1990) (familial relationship existed between victim of uncharged child abuse and victim of charged child abuse); Marker v. State, 748 P.2d 295 (Wyo.1988) (accused's uncharged possession of sadomasochistic literature admissible to prove identity of accused as perpetrator of charged ......