Marlborough Ass'n v. Peters

Decision Date22 May 1901
Citation179 Mass. 61,60 N.E. 396
PartiesMARLBOROUGH ASS'N v. PETERS.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

Clement

G. Morgan, for plaintiff.

William J. Williams, for defendant.

OPINION

HOLMES, C.J.

This is an action by a corporation formed under Pub. St. c. 115, against a defaulting treasurer. There was no question of the default, and no defense upon the merits, but the defendant asked for a ruling that the action was brought prematurely, since it did not appear that the defendant was not still treasurer and entitled to hold the money. This ruling was refused, and the defendant excepted.

Pub. St. c. 106, § 24, providing for officers holding over until their successors are elected, does not prevent the termination of an office by mutual understanding before a permanent successor is appointed. The plaintiff, after electing a new treasurer and his refusal to serve, elected one Gray temporary treasurer for the purpose of effecting a settlement with the defendant. Gray wrote to him and received promises, and afterwards Gray and the officers of the plaintiff made a demand upon the defendant for the plaintiff's property. The dealings plainly implied an agreement of both sides that the defendant's office was at an end, and warranted a finding to that effect. Furthermore, a treasurer holding money of a corporation is bound to keep it distinct, and, if he appropriates it and makes himself a debtor by wrong instead of a trustee, he may be sued by the corporation at once, whether his office continues or not.

Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT