Marmaduke v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R.R. Co.

Decision Date31 July 1860
Citation30 Mo. 545
PartiesMARMADUKE et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. HANNIBAL AND ST. JOSEPH RAILROAD CO. et al., Defendants in Error.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. A bill of peace to quiet title can not be maintained where the title has not been called in question in actions at law in the nature of actions of ejectment.

Error to Macon Circuit Court.

This was an action against the Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad Company and others to determine and quiet the title to several pieces of land. Plaintiffs, as appears from the petition, claim title to said lands as a portion of the swamp lands given to the state of Missouri by act of Congress of September 28, 1850, and granted by the state to Macon county by act of March 3, 1851, and acquired under the county by plaintiffs. The Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad Company claimed to own said lands under act of Congress of June 10, 1852; and of the state, of September 20, 1852. Plaintiffs set forth that the Hannibal and St. Joseph Railroad had mortgaged said lands to defendants and were trying to sell them. Plaintiffs prayed for an injunction against the sale of the lands.

Prewitt, for plaintiffs in error.

Lamb & Lakenan, for defendants in error, cited 28 Mo. 211.

EWING, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a proceeding in the nature of a bill of peace, and the case is not distinguishable from that of Patterson & wife v. McCamant, 28 Mo. 211.

Judgment affirmed;

the other judges concurring.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Northcutt v. Eager
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • January 28, 1896
    ...relief in a large class of cases that were remediless under the old forms of procedure. Patterson v. McCamant, 28 Mo. 210; Marmaduke v. Railroad, 30 Mo. 545; v. Marshall, 8 F. 398; Joyce v. McAvoy, 31 Cal. 274; Castro v. Barry, 21 P. 946, and cases hereinafter cited. (2) The federal courts ......
  • Porter v. Reed
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1894
    ...dismissed is not enough to warrant a court of equity in interposing its power of injunction. Patterson v. McCamant, 28 Mo. 210; Marmaduke v. Railroad, 30 Mo. 545; v. Inches, 12 Cal. 212; Bond v. Little, 10 Ga. 395; Gunn v. Harrison, 7 Ala. 585. (3) In order to maintain a bill of peace the a......
  • Abbott v. Marion Mining Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 3, 1914

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT