Marra v. State, DD-176
| Decision Date | 19 January 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. DD-176,DD-176 |
| Citation | 341 So.2d 284 |
| Parties | George A. MARRA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
A prisoner in the State's custody at Union Correctional Institute urges he was subjected to an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights, when on a tip but without warrant or exigent circumstances correctional officers required him to open his personal locker, previously locked with a key in appellant's possession. The locker contained 111 grams of cannabis. Appellant was convicted of its possession. We reject his contention. Although a citizen is not wholly stripped of constitutional protections when imprisoned for crime, search and surveillance necessary for security of the prison must qualify the prisoner's reasonable expectations of privacy. This prisoner had no immunity from a good faith search for contraband conducted by correctional officers, in his presence, with or without his consent. See Lanza v. New York, 370 U.S. 139, 82 S.Ct. 1218, 8 L.Ed.2d 384 (1962) (dictum); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). Appellant's other point on appeal is not meritorious. State v. Lott, 286 So.2d 565 (Fla.1973), cert. denied 417 U.S. 913, 94 S.Ct. 2613, 41 L.Ed.2d 217 (1974).
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wells v. State
...hold that search and surveillance necessary for prison security must qualify a prisoner's expectation of privacy. Marra v. State, 341 So.2d 284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Prisoners can be subjected to very invasive searches if the search is "reasonable", even absent probable cause, without violat......
-
Vera v. State
...narrowed to accommodate institutional objectives. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979); Marra v. State, 341 So.2d 284 (Fla.1st DCA 1977). See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). As a result of the decreased expectation of pr......
- Keith v. Keith, AA-381