Marriage of Horstmann, In re
Decision Date | 22 March 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 60593,60593 |
Citation | 263 N.W.2d 885 |
Parties | In re the MARRIAGE OF Donna Lee HORSTMANN and Randall George Horstmann. Upon the Petition of Donna Lee HORSTMANN, Appellee, and concerning Randall George HORSTMANN, Appellant. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Charles A. Barker, Iowa City, for appellant.
William F. Sueppel, Iowa City, for appellee.
Considered by MOORE, C. J., and MASON, RAWLINGS, LeGRAND and REYNOLDSON, JJ.
This is an appeal by Randall George Horstmann from the economic provisions of a decree terminating the marital relationship existing between him and petitioner, Donna Horstmann.
We set out in chronological order the legal proceedings giving rise to this appeal. March 5, 1976, Donna Horstmann filed a petition for dissolution of her marriage with Randall Horstmann. December 10, trial was had in this matter. December 20, the parties entered into a number of stipulations. March 10, 1977, the trial court filed its findings of fact, conclusions of law and decree. Respondent appealed from the decree challenging the $18,000 property distribution, the one dollar a year token alimony and the seventy-five dollar a week child support provisions of the decree.
October 31, 1969, Donna and Randall were married while in their junior year at the University of Iowa. Randall completed his undergraduate course of study and in 1973 obtained a masters degree at the University. The couple then moved to Des Moines because Randall had decided to attend law school at Drake University. In 1976 he received his law degree and was later admitted to the bar. At the time of trial he was in his first of two years as lawclerk to a federal district court judge. He had just received a.$1000.00 cost of living increase which raised his take-home pay from $383.00 to $400.00 every two weeks or $900.00 a month.
During the term of the marriage Randall worked part time earning a total of $9196.00. At the time of trial he owed $450.00 on his Master Charge, $5680.00 to his parents, $7000.00 to a bank and $1500 to Drake University. It was stipulated he was to pay these debts.
Donna did not complete her formal education. In 1970 she gave birth to the couple's only child. Between 1973 and 1975, while Randall was attending law school, Donna worked at a bank in Des Moines. During the term of the marriage she earned $15,760.00 which was contributed by her to pay the family's living expenses. At the time of trial she owed $13,900.00 on a mobile home she had purchased after the couple separated. She was then employed at a bank in Iowa City. Her take-home pay was $405.00 a month but she would soon receive a raise of unknown amount. She testified the most she could ever hope to earn at her present job was $600.00 a month.
During the marriage the couple had been assisted financially by their parents. Randall's parents not only loaned him money but also provided free use of a mobile home for the family for four years. Donna's parents supplied the family with all the meat they used, bought Donna a car worth $3300.00 and provided the family with other money totaling $10,514.00.
From July of 1975 when the couple separated until October 28, 1976, Randall contributed $350.00 toward the support of Donna and the child. On that date the court ordered Randall to pay Donna $100.00 every two weeks and $250.00 as temporary attorney fees. At trial Donna's attorney established Randall had earned over $5,000.00 during this period and had also borrowed $2,000.00. He had paid no rent. He had not been required to pay tuition at Drake because he was editor-in-chief of the law review.
Prior to trial each party submitted a financial statement and affidavit to the court. Donna itemized the expenses necessary to support herself and the child. Her expenses totaled $740.00 (originally listed at $765.00 but amended at trial) which meant she needed $335.00 a month above her salary to maintain herself and the child.
In his statement Randall itemized his expenses as $524.00 a month. It was also noted he had ordered a new car for which he would have to pay $166.00 a month. This car would replace a 1969 car he owned.
During the trial in this matter Donna testified to the following:
Randall testified after his two years as a lawclerk were over he hoped to obtain employment with the United States Department of Justice. He believed his starting salary with the Department would be approximately the same as his current salary. He thought the salary increased about.$1000.00 a year to a maximum salary of $26,000.
He explained monthly payments totaling $100.00 on the loans to the bank and the university would not have to begin until May of 1977. No testimony was elicited as to repayment of the $5680.00 loan from his parents.
March 10, 1977, the trial court issued its findings of fact, conclusions of law and decree which were filed March 18. In its conclusions of law the court made the following pertinent remarks:
In its decree the court dissolved the marriage and awarded Donna custody of the child. It then ordered Randall to pay Donna $18,000 of which $1500 plus accrued interest thereon would be due January 1, 1978, $1500 plus accrued interest due January 1, 1979, $3000 plus accrued interest each successive year until paid in full.
It awarded Donna $1.00 a year alimony in order to preserve the issue of alimony. The first payment thereon would be due December 31, 1977. It then divided up the debts and personal property of the parties as they had agreed in their stipulation.
The court next ordered Randall to pay Donna $75.00 a week in child support beginning March 25, 1977, and continuing until the child attains the age of eighteen, dies or becomes self supporting, whichever event shall first occur. It also made other orders which are not at issue here.
Respondent asserts the following issues are presented for review:
1. Is a law school education and admittance to the bar an asset of a marriage to be considered in a property division?
2. Did the trial court err in awarding alimony to the petitioner?
3. Did the trial court err in awarding an excessive amount of child support to the petitioner?
I. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Washburn v. Washburn
...valuation of the degree or earning potential. See Woodworth v. Woodworth, 126 Mich.App. 258, 337 N.W.2d 332 (1983); In re Marriage of Horstmann, 263 N.W.2d 885 (Iowa 1978). Another line of cases holds that, although a professional degree is not property, the supporting spouse is entitled to......
-
Archer v. Archer
...of McManama, 179 Ind.App. 513, 386 N.E.2d 953 (1979), vacated on other grounds, 272 Ind. 483, 399 N.E.2d 371 (1980); In re Marriage of Horstmann, 263 N.W.2d 885 (Iowa 1978); Inman v. Inman, 648 S.W.2d 847 (Ky.1982); DeLa Rosa v. DeLa Rosa, 309 N.W.2d 755 (Minn.1981); Ruben v. Ruben, 123 N.H......
-
Marriage of Sullivan, In re
...by the highest courts of Colorado, Iowa, and New Jersey, in the cases of Graham v. Graham, supra, 574 P.2d 75, In re Marriage of Horstmann (1978) Iowa, 263 N.W.2d 885, and Stern v. Stern (1975) 66 N.J. 340, 331 A.2d 257, respectively, the Aufmuth court concluded (89 Cal.App.3d at p. 461, 15......
-
Marriage of Weinstein, In re
...Severs (Fla.App.1983), 426 So.2d 992); Indiana (McManama v. McManama (1980), 272 Ind. 483, 399 N.E.2d 371); Iowa (In re Marriage of Horstmann (Iowa S.Ct.1978), 263 N.W.2d 885); Kentucky (Inman v. Inman (Ky.S.Ct.1982), 648 S.W.2d 847; McGowan v. McGowan (Ky.App.1983), 663 S.W.2d 219; Leveck ......
-
§ 9.02 States without Express Statutes
...Hodge v. Hodge, 337 Pa. Super. 151, 486 A.2d 951 (1948), aff'd 513 Pa. 264, 520 A.2d 15 (1986). But see, In re Marriage of Horstmann, 263 N.W.2d 885 (Iowa 1978).[140] The spouses' earning capacities can be considered when awarding alimony. See, e.g., Stern v. Stern, id. [141] See § 7.10 sup......
-
§ 5.02 Determining What Is "Property"
...722 S.W.2d 533 (Tex. App. 1986).[34] McClerin v. McClerin, 425 S.E.2d 476 (S.C. App. 1992). [35] See, e.g., In re Marriage of Horstmann, 263 N.W.2d 885 (Iowa 1978). Cf., Meinholz v. Meinholz, 678 S.W.2d 348 (Ark. 1984).[36] See Moritz v. Moritz, 10 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1534 (Pa. Comm. Pl. 198......