Marriage of Nevil, In re
| Decision Date | 28 March 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 89CA1868,89CA1868 |
| Parties | In re the MARRIAGE OF Evelyn NEVIL, Appellee, and Frank Nevil, Appellant. . V |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Theodore A. Borrillo, Denver, for appellee.
Law Office of Larry M. Leach, Larry M. Leach, Sheryl L. Tucker, Denver, for appellant.
Opinion by Judge HUME.
In this dissolution of marriage action, Frank Nevil, husband, appeals the award of maintenance to Evelyn Nevil, wife. Husband contends that the trial court erred in awarding maintenance because his income consists of monthly payments derived from his Veteran's Administration Disability Pension and Civil Service Retirement Pension, both of which were earned prior to this twelve-year marriage. He also argues that an award of maintenance which is payable from these sources indirectly divides his disability pension, contrary to federal law preempting this issue. We affirm.
Prior to our supreme court's decision in In re Marriage of Gallo, 752 P.2d 47 (Colo.1988), Colorado appellate decisions adhered to the principle that military pensions were not considered marital property. See Ellis v. Ellis, 191 Colo. 317, 552 P.2d 506 (1976). Nevertheless, even prior to In re Marriage of Gallo, supra, military retirement pay constituted a source of income that could be properly considered in fixing the amount of maintenance and child support. See In re Marriage of Grubb, 721 P.2d 1194 (Colo.App.1986), rev'd on other grounds, 745 P.2d 661 (Colo.1987); In re Marriage of Ellis, 36 Colo.App. 234, 538 P.2d 1347 (1975), aff'd, Ellis v. Ellis, supra. Therefore, husband's argument that his disability pay may not be considered in determining his ability to pay maintenance is without merit. See also In re Marriage of Fain, 794 P.2d 1086 (Colo.App.1990).
The federal law relied upon by husband is limited to a consideration of the treatment of military disability as marital property, rather than as a resource to be considered in determining the propriety and amount of an award of spousal maintenance, and therefore, it is inapplicable to the issues presented here. In addition, because of the qualitative difference between a maintenance award and a division of property, we are not persuaded by husband's argument that by awarding maintenance to wife, the court is indirectly accomplishing what it may not do directly.
Awards of maintenance and modifications thereof must be based upon the parties' needs and their circumstances at the time of the hearing rather than...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Marriage of Strong v. Strong
... ... See In re Marriage of Kraft (1992), 119 Wash.2d 438, 832 P.2d 871 ; Womack v. Womack (1991), 307 Ark. 269, 818 S.W.2d 958 ; In re Marriage of Nevil (Colo. Ct.App.1991), 809 P.2d 1122 ; Riley v. Riley (1990), 82 Md.App. 400, 571 A.2d 1261 ; Lambert v. Lambert (1990), 10 Va.App. 623, 395 S.E.2d 207 ; Weberg v. Weberg (1990), 158 Wis.2d 540, 463 N.W.2d 382 ; see also Lawrence J. Golden, Equitable Distribution of Property § 6.06A, at ... ...
-
In re M.E.R-L.
... ... C.R.C.P. 16.2(j) ; see In re Marriage of Cardona , 321 P.3d 518, 527 (Colo. App. 2010), aff'd on other grounds , 2014 CO 3, 316 P.3d 626. The court abuses its discretion when its decision ... at , 137 S. Ct. at 1406 (citing Rose , 481 U.S. at 630-34, 632 n.6, 107 S.Ct. 2029 ); cf. In re Marriage of Nevil , 809 P.2d 1122, 1123 (Colo. App. 1991) (holding that federal law does not prohibit consideration of military disability benefits when "determining ... ...
-
In re Marriage of Warkocz
... ... Here, the parties agreed to a division of husband's military retirement pay, if and when received, which ultimately could be satisfied from other property. Cf. In re Marriage of Nevil, 809 P.2d 1122, 1123 (Colo.App.1991)(rejecting husband's argument that disability pay could not be considered in determining his ability to pay maintenance). However, they did not define "military retirement" differently from its normally understood meaning ... According the phrase ... ...
-
Marriage of Smith, In re
... ... See § 14-10-114(2)(f), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6B); § 14-10-115(7)(a), C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.); In re Marriage of Nevil, 809 P.2d 1122 (Colo.App.1991) ... Since the property distribution has been set aside, the maintenance order must also be set aside and the cause remanded for reconsideration of that issue. See In re Marriage of Rogers, 709 P.2d 1383 (Colo.App.1985) ... That part ... ...
-
V.a. Payments and Family Support
...Womack, 307 Ark. 269, 818 S.W.2d 958 (1991); Murphy v. Murphy, 302 Ark. 157, 787 S.W.2d 684 (1990) * Colorado - In re Marriage of Nevil, 809 P.2d 1122 (Colo. App. 1991) * Iowa - In re Marriage of Howell, 434 N. W. 2d 629, 633 ( Iowa 1989) * Kansas - In the Matter of the Marriage of Bahr, 32......
-
V.a. Payments and Family Support
...1983) Arkansas: Womack v. Womack, S.W.2d 958 (Ark. 1991); Murphy v. Murphy, 787 S.W.2d 684 (Ark. 1990) Colorado: In re Marriage of Nevil, 809 P.2d 1122 (Colo. App. 1991) Iowa: In re Marriage of Howell, 434 N. W. 2d 629, 633 (Iowa 1989) Kansas: In the Matter of the Marriage of Bahr, 32 P.3d ......
-
Marital or Separate Property: an Overview for Practitioners
...30. In re Marriage of Renier, 854 P.2d 1382 (Colo.App. 1993). 31. Marriage of Simon, supra, note 12. 32. Id. 33. In re Marriage of Nevil, 809 P.2d 1122 (Colo.App. 1991); Marriage of Franz, supra, note 10. 34. See In re Marriage of Peterson, 870 P.2d 630 (Colo.App. 1994). 35. Supra, note 2 a......
-
Chapter 6 - § 6.16 • MISCELLANEOUS PROPERTY RIGHTS
...817 P.2d 641 (Colo. App. 1991) (workers' compensation benefits for future lost earnings not marital property); In re Marriage of Nevil, 809 P.2d 1122 (Colo. App. 1991) (Veterans Administration disability pension is not considered property). However, proceeds from a private disability insura......