Marro v. ST. VINCENT'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER OF NEW YORK
| Decision Date | 06 May 2002 |
| Citation | 742 N.Y.S.2d 327,294 A.D.2d 341 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | KENNEDY MARRO, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>ST. VINCENT'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.)<BR>KENNEDY MARRO, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>IRA J. WAGNER et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)<BR>KENNEDY MARRO, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)<BR>KENNEDY MARRO, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>TPK CONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellant, and<BR>HELEN CARR CONSTRUCTION CORP., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant.<BR>EL SOL CONTRACTING & CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (Action Nos. 4 & 5.) |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the motions to dismiss the complaint and cross claims pursuant to CPLR 3126 based upon the plaintiff's spoliation of evidence only to the extent of directing that the trial court give a negative inference charge against the plaintiff. "Where a crucial item of evidence is lost, either intentionally or negligently, the party responsible should be precluded from offering evidence as to its condition" (Yi Min Ren v Professional Steam-Cleaning, 271 AD2d 602, 603). Moreover, where the lost item is the "key" evidence in the case, the proper sanction is to strike the pleading of the responsible party (see DiDomenico v C & S Aeromatik Supplies, 252 AD2d 41, 53; Squitieri v City of New York, 248 AD2d 201, 202; Kirkland v New York City Hous. Auth., 236 AD2d 170, 173). However, a less drastic sanction than dismissal of the responsible party's pleading may be imposed where the loss does not deprive the nonresponsible party of the means of establishing his or her claim or defense (see Chiu Ping Chung v Caravan Coach Co., 285 AD2d 621).
While it was the plaintiff's conduct which resulted in the destruction of the subject item of evidence, a motorcycle, the drastic remedy of dismissal of the complaint is unwarranted. There were three eyewitnesses to the happening of the accident, all of whom submitted affidavits or statements indicating their observations of the accident. There exist several photographs depicting the postaccident condition of the motorcycle. Additionally, the ambulance call report, the emergency room report, and several other records indicate the condition of the plaintiff upon his arrival at the hospital. Thus, the Supreme Court properly...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Scordo v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
...condition of the car ( see Mylonas v. Town of Brookhaven, 305 A.D.2d 561, 563, 759 N.Y.S.2d 752; Marro v. St. Vincent's Hosp. & Med. Ctr. of N.Y., 294 A.D.2d 341, 742 N.Y.S.2d 327; Chiu Ping Chung v. Caravan Coach Co., 285 A.D.2d 621, 728 N.Y.S.2d 767). Additionally, the Supreme Court provi......
-
Sarach v. M & T Bank Corp.
...does not deprive the nonresponsible party of the means of establishing his or her claim or defense” (Marro v. St. Vincent's Hosp. & Med. Ctr. of N.Y., 294 A.D.2d 341, 342, 742 N.Y.S.2d 327 ). Indeed, we note that the record does not demonstrate that the plaintiff has been “ ‘prejudicially b......
-
Dori v. Rabco Eng'g
...725,910 N.Y.S.2d 440 (2d Dept., 2010); Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Berkoski Oil Company, supra; Marro v. St. Vincent's Hospital, 294 A.D.2d 341, 742 N.Y.S.2d 327 [2d Dept., 2002]). Plaintiffs allege in their complaint, bill of particulars, and supplemental bill of particulars that def......
-
Archer v. Scott, 2008 NY Slip Op 32858(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 10/6/2008)
...non-responsible party of the means of establishing his...defense," a lesser sanction may be imposed by the judge. (Marro v. St. Vincent's Hospital, 294 A.D.2d 341, 341-342.) Defendants Scott correctly assert that no proof exists showing Andrea Archer was aware that the evidence might be nee......