Marrs v. Twitty, 12332

Decision Date09 June 1982
Docket NumberNo. 12332,12332
Citation635 S.W.2d 374
PartiesClaude MARRS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gary R. TWITTY and Sharon K. Twitty, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Herbert Douglas, Douglas, Douglas & Johnson, Neosho, for plaintiff-respondent.

C. R. Rhoades, Rhoades & Perigo, Neosho, for defendants-appellants.

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-respondent sought judgment for the amount of a real estate commission. Following a non-jury trial, the court entered judgment for $5,200 in favor of plaintiff.

Defendants claim that the trial court erred: (1) in determining that "It makes no difference as far as the real estate commission to plaintiff is concerned that either Buyer or Seller later failed to perform"; defendants contend that this finding is contrary to the law and that plaintiff did not procure a purchaser who was ready, willing and able to purchase the property according to the contract terms; (2) because the evidence showed that the contract was not capable of being performed on the scheduled closing date and there was neither an agreement for an extension of time for performance as required by the statute of frauds nor any showing of consideration for such an extension; and (3) in allowing testimony that defendants agreed to an oral extension of the closing date because that evidence violated the parol evidence rule.

Plaintiff is a licensed real estate broker with an office in Anderson, Missouri. On March 31, 1980, he entered into a "Missouri Farm Listing Agreement" with defendants. This agreement provided that if a buyer was found for a farm owned by defendants located at Route 1, Goodman, Missouri, before September 30, 1980, then plaintiff would receive a commission of 7% of the sale price. On August 6, 1980, defendants agreed with Curtis and Sharon Swanson to exchange the farm for a house and lot owned by the Swansons in Bentonville, Arkansas. The agreement with the Swansons was evidenced by two written documents, each denoted "CONTRACT for the SALE of REAL ESTATE". These were form contracts filled in by plaintiff and signed by defendants and the Swansons. One provided that defendants' farm would be sold to the Swansons "subject to the acceptance of sister contract made by Gary and Sharon Twitty to Purchace (sic) home and lot located at 710 West Central, Bentonville, Arkansas." This document stated that defendants would pay plaintiff a commission of $5,200. The other "CONTRACT" stated that defendants would purchase from the Swansons their house and lot "subject to the acceptance of sister contract made by Curtis and Sharon Swanson to purchase caged layer farm owned by Gary and Sharon Twitty." It also provided that "Seller is to completely finish upstairs bedroms (sic)." Both documents set forth a closing date of August 15, 1980, "or at such other time and place as the parties may mutually agree."

Because improvements to the upstairs bedrooms were not finished by August 15, 1980, the transaction was not concluded on that date. Plaintiff testified that on August 15, 1980, defendants orally agreed to extend the date of closing to August 19, 1980. Gary Twitty stated that when he talked to plaintiff on August 15, 1980, plaintiff said he would go to Bentonville and Twitty asked plaintiff "to see what the value of the house was and how much was completed," but that the time of closing never came up. Gary Twitty said he thought "that it wasn't up to us to set up the closing." He said, "we thought it was up to Benton County." He was apparently referring to the Benton County Savings & Loan Association. It had made a loan commitment to defendants, with the loan to be secured by the house that defendants were to purchase from the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • In re Parsons, Bankruptcy No. 00-60323.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Western District of Missouri
    • August 30, 2000
    ...Mid-Atlantic Corp., 876 S.W.2d 714, 716 (Mo.Ct.App.1994); Malone v. Johnson, 866 S.W.2d 935, 940 (Mo.Ct.App. 1993); Marrs v. Twitty, 635 S.W.2d 374, 376 (Mo.Ct.App.1982); E.A. Mabes and Co. v. Fishman., 284 S.W.2d 21, 26 (Mo.Ct.App. 9 876 S.W.2d at 716. 10 202 B.R. 481 (9th Cir. BAP 1996). ......
  • Malone v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 1993
    ...produces a buyer ready, willing and able to buy on terms specified by the seller, whether or not the sale is completed. Marrs v. Twitty, 635 S.W.2d 374, 376 (Mo.App.1982); E.A. Mabes and Co. v. Fishman, 284 S.W.2d 21, 26 The seller is liable for his broker's commission when a purchaser is w......
  • Baker v. McCue-Moyle Development Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 1984
    ...commissions were earned when they produced a ready, willing and able buyer. They were entitled to their commission. Marrs v. Twitty, 635 S.W.2d 374, 376 (Mo.App.1982). E.A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. McKelvy, 424 S.W.2d 98, 101 McCue's contention on behalf of the appellant that the origi......
  • Meridian Interests, Inc. v. J.A. Peterson Enterprises, Inc.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 30, 1985
    ...produces a buyer ready, willing and able to buy on terms specified by the seller, whether or not the sale is completed. Marrs v. Twitty, 635 S.W.2d 374, 376 (Mo.App.1982); E.A. Mabes and Co. v. Fishman, 284 S.W.2d 21, 26 (Mo.App.1955). A seller and his broker may by express contract conditi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT